多元文化背景下“和而不同”思想及其当代价值
发布时间：2018-12-13 23:48
【摘要】：在这个文化与经济早已密不可分的时代里，文化本身就是一种市场，而且是一种可以带来高额利润的消费市场，作为价值观载体的各文化之间因交流而产生的冲突，其实质是由于价值观念的差异导致冲突的具体体现。在多元文化背景的驱使之下，必然会改变地球上不同民族及文化背景的人们，不同文化之间因加剧交流所发生的碰撞和冲突，在世界范围内形成了复杂且矛盾的文化发展态势，究竟该如何平衡各民族文化间的关系，使各民族的文化进入一个开放和交融的新的发展时代成为世界性难题。 西方“多元文化主义”理论自二十世纪90年代流行至今，有不少学者围绕着多元文化主义问题展开了研讨，一时之间涌现了大量的学术作品，并对中国思想界和学术界产生了一定的影响。不得不说，西方的多元文化主义思想与中国的“和而不同”精神较为接近，也都在解决多元文化共存的问题上有积极意义。然而这两种思想在文化背景上相差很大，西方“多元文化主义”坚持了西方传统的先“分”而后“合”的思路，它是建立在各民族群体的文化个性与权利的基础之上，适应了西方社会的文化现实，却并不一定适用于其他国家。 中国文化发展的特点就是在历史过程中逐渐形成了自己“多元一体”的独特文化格局。从我国的领导人到国内外政治、哲学等领域的专家学者，都对中国文化中“和而不同”的传统思想及其当代价值进行了大量的探讨和研究。我国提出的关于构建“和谐社会”、“和谐世界”的发展理想，，标志了中国在国家建设、社会发展及对外关系等方面一直都秉承着“和而不同”的思想和文化理念。 本文立足于现实，通过对多元文化的背景分析厘清相关概念，并对“和而不同”思想内涵及其文化地位给予肯定。在对西方“多元文化主义”与“和而不同”的对比中充分肯定了后者的优势，在中西方文化关于文化多元性问题的不同理解中，肯定了“和而不同”思想的当代价值，指出它是可能成为当代国际关系和未来世界秩序稳定发展的理想模式，同时为世界多元文化的和谐发展提供了可借鉴的可能。
[Abstract]:In an era in which culture and economy have long been inextricably linked, culture is itself a market and a consumer market that can bring high profits. As a carrier of values, there is a conflict between cultures as a result of communication. Its essence is the concrete embodiment of the conflict caused by the difference of values. Driven by the multicultural background, it will inevitably change the people of different nationalities and cultural backgrounds on the earth. The collision and conflict between different cultures due to the intensification of communication has formed a complex and contradictory cultural development situation in the world. How to balance the relationship between the cultures of different nationalities and make the culture of all nationalities enter a new era of opening and blending becomes a difficult problem in the world. Since the popularity of the western theory of "multiculturalism" in the 1990s, many scholars have studied the issue of multiculturalism, and a large number of academic works have emerged. And has produced certain influence to the Chinese thought circle and the academic circle. It has to be said that the western multiculturalism is close to the spirit of "harmony but difference" in China, and both have positive significance in solving the problem of multiculturalism coexistence. However, these two ideas are quite different in the cultural background. Western "multiculturalism" adheres to the idea of "dividing" before "combining" in the western tradition, which is based on the cultural personality and rights of various ethnic groups. Adapted to the cultural reality of Western society, but not necessarily applicable to other countries. The characteristic of Chinese culture development is that it has gradually formed its own unique cultural pattern of "pluralistic integration" in the course of history. From the leaders of our country to the experts and scholars in the fields of politics, philosophy and so on, the traditional thought of "harmony but difference" in Chinese culture and its contemporary value have been discussed and studied extensively. The development ideal of constructing "harmonious society" and "harmonious world" put forward by our country symbolizes that China has been adhering to the idea of "harmony but not difference" in the aspects of national construction, social development and foreign relations. Based on reality, this paper clarifies the relevant concepts through the background analysis of multiculturalism, and affirms the connotation and cultural status of the thought of "harmony but difference". In the comparison between "multiculturalism" and "harmony but difference" in the West, the advantages of the latter are fully affirmed, and the contemporary value of the thought of "harmony but difference" is affirmed in the different understanding of cultural pluralism between Chinese and western cultures. It is pointed out that it may become an ideal model for the stable development of contemporary international relations and the future world order, and it also provides the possibility for the harmonious development of the world's multiculturalism.
【学位授予单位】：青海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G02
本文编号：2377479
[Abstract]:In an era in which culture and economy have long been inextricably linked, culture is itself a market and a consumer market that can bring high profits. As a carrier of values, there is a conflict between cultures as a result of communication. Its essence is the concrete embodiment of the conflict caused by the difference of values. Driven by the multicultural background, it will inevitably change the people of different nationalities and cultural backgrounds on the earth. The collision and conflict between different cultures due to the intensification of communication has formed a complex and contradictory cultural development situation in the world. How to balance the relationship between the cultures of different nationalities and make the culture of all nationalities enter a new era of opening and blending becomes a difficult problem in the world. Since the popularity of the western theory of "multiculturalism" in the 1990s, many scholars have studied the issue of multiculturalism, and a large number of academic works have emerged. And has produced certain influence to the Chinese thought circle and the academic circle. It has to be said that the western multiculturalism is close to the spirit of "harmony but difference" in China, and both have positive significance in solving the problem of multiculturalism coexistence. However, these two ideas are quite different in the cultural background. Western "multiculturalism" adheres to the idea of "dividing" before "combining" in the western tradition, which is based on the cultural personality and rights of various ethnic groups. Adapted to the cultural reality of Western society, but not necessarily applicable to other countries. The characteristic of Chinese culture development is that it has gradually formed its own unique cultural pattern of "pluralistic integration" in the course of history. From the leaders of our country to the experts and scholars in the fields of politics, philosophy and so on, the traditional thought of "harmony but difference" in Chinese culture and its contemporary value have been discussed and studied extensively. The development ideal of constructing "harmonious society" and "harmonious world" put forward by our country symbolizes that China has been adhering to the idea of "harmony but not difference" in the aspects of national construction, social development and foreign relations. Based on reality, this paper clarifies the relevant concepts through the background analysis of multiculturalism, and affirms the connotation and cultural status of the thought of "harmony but difference". In the comparison between "multiculturalism" and "harmony but difference" in the West, the advantages of the latter are fully affirmed, and the contemporary value of the thought of "harmony but difference" is affirmed in the different understanding of cultural pluralism between Chinese and western cultures. It is pointed out that it may become an ideal model for the stable development of contemporary international relations and the future world order, and it also provides the possibility for the harmonious development of the world's multiculturalism.
【学位授予单位】：青海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G02
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋尉;“9·11”之后的国际恐怖活动及反恐斗争的若干动向和问题——访中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所副所长王逸舟[J];国际经济评论;2004年04期
2 王希;多元文化主义的起源、实践与局限性[J];美国研究;2000年02期
3 陈秀萍;;契约的伦理内核——西方契约精神的伦理解析[J];南京社会科学;2006年08期
4 吴世彩;刘家俊;;“和而不同”与“契约精神”——中西方和谐社会理念比较[J];宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版);2008年03期
5 丁立群;文化进步主义:全球化时代的哲学理念[J];求是学刊;2001年05期
6 妥建清;;多元的现代性——兼驳“文明的冲突”抑或“承认的政治”[J];思想战线;2009年05期
7 白西乔;;传统“和同”思想及其当代意蕴[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
8 秦亚青;权势霸权、制度霸权与美国的地位[J];现代国际关系;2004年03期
9 杨洪贵;;多元共存 和谐共处——试论多元文化主义[J];新疆社会科学;2006年03期
10 盛洪;什么是文明[J];战略与管理;1995年05期
本文编号：2377479
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/2377479.html
