女性民俗学者、田野作业与社会性别制度——基于对22位民俗学者的访谈和个人的田野经验
发布时间：2018-12-16 17:45
【摘要】：对22位以田野作业为搜集资料之主要方法的民俗学者做了一个简短的微信访谈,主题是"女性做田野的优势和劣势"。女性学者从事田野作业,有一些性别上的优势,如亲和力强、更容易被人接纳和信任。只是,传统社会性别制度同时也反映在民俗学者与访谈对象之间的关系建构中,比如女性学者一般不像男性学者那样被视为"专家""权威",甚至有一些话题对她们缺乏开放性。性别视角确实是一个必要的研究维度,女性研究者在某些话题上能与女性研究对象进行更好的沟通和讨论。但个体的性格特征、学术背景、兴趣爱好、身分特征等方面的因素也会影响到田野作业,这些因素不仅会影响到研究者对调查对象的思考和把握,也会影响田野地点的选择和田野作业的过程、结果,以及对于原始资料的分析和阐释。
[Abstract]:A brief WeChat interview was conducted with 22 folklore scholars who used field work as the main method of collecting data. The topic was "the strengths and weaknesses of women in the field". Female scholars, who work in the field, have some gender advantages, such as strong affinity, and are more likely to be accepted and trusted. However, the traditional gender system is also reflected in the construction of the relationship between folklore and interviewees, such as female scholars are not generally regarded as "experts" and "authority" as male scholars. There are even topics that lack openness to them. Gender perspective is a necessary research dimension, female researchers can better communicate and discuss with female research subjects on some topics. However, factors such as personality, academic background, interest, identity and other factors will also affect the field work. These factors will not only affect the researchers' thinking and understanding of the subjects, It also affects the selection of field locations and the process and results of field operations, as well as the analysis and interpretation of the original data.
【作者单位】： 山东大学儒学高等研究院民俗学研究所;
【分类号】：K890
[Abstract]:A brief WeChat interview was conducted with 22 folklore scholars who used field work as the main method of collecting data. The topic was "the strengths and weaknesses of women in the field". Female scholars, who work in the field, have some gender advantages, such as strong affinity, and are more likely to be accepted and trusted. However, the traditional gender system is also reflected in the construction of the relationship between folklore and interviewees, such as female scholars are not generally regarded as "experts" and "authority" as male scholars. There are even topics that lack openness to them. Gender perspective is a necessary research dimension, female researchers can better communicate and discuss with female research subjects on some topics. However, factors such as personality, academic background, interest, identity and other factors will also affect the field work. These factors will not only affect the researchers' thinking and understanding of the subjects, It also affects the selection of field locations and the process and results of field operations, as well as the analysis and interpretation of the original data.
【作者单位】： 山东大学儒学高等研究院民俗学研究所;
【分类号】：K890
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 邵凤丽;;民俗学与社会学田野作业的比较——以中日民俗学·社会学青年学者论坛为个案[J];民间文化论坛;2011年01期
2 ;我们给谁画像,怎样才画得像?——从田野作业的真实性说起[J];西北民族研究;2007年03期
3 叶大兵;;论田野作业和文献研究的辩证关系[J];民间文学论坛;1995年02期
4 刘兴禄;;试谈民俗学课堂教学中的田野作业及其实施路径[J];遵义师范学院学报;2014年02期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 陶立t，
本文编号：2382781
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/2382781.html
