西方权威遗产话语及其与中国传统遗产保护理念的对比
发布时间：2019-02-20 19:00
【摘要】：西方“权威遗产话语”强调遗产的真实性、物质性、纪念碑性，及历史、艺术与科学价值，体现了西方启蒙运动以来的现代历史观和文化思维逻辑，反映了中上层白人群体的西方精英文化价值观，构成了今天国际遗产保护的宪章和基本原则，也很大程度上影响了我国文物领域法规与政策的制定。中国的保护理论和实践，存在诸如对权威遗产话语的误读、盲目屈从以及本土话语发育不足等问题，造成理论混乱和实践中的水土不服，一定程度上损伤了本土历史记忆方式和价值观念。本研究将利用历史研究方法、多学科视野分析、比较研究等方法，首先从词源与词义角度对“古迹”、“遗产”等建筑遗产保护领域相关词语的释义及其理解方面进行研究，探讨以上词语的本义及在建筑遗产保护领域所具有的含义；其次是探讨西方权威遗产话语的发展，以及中西传统遗产价值观的比较分析；厘清西方权威遗产话语真相，并寻找其本土化表达，，研究中国传统建筑价值取向和话语体系，反思近代以来的保护思想观念所存在的问题，为重构当代具有中国特色、解决中国现实问题的保护理论体系奠定和提供理论基础和依据。
[Abstract]:"authoritative Heritage discourse" emphasizes the authenticity, materiality, monumental, historical, artistic and scientific value of the heritage, which embodies the modern historical view and cultural thinking logic since the Western Enlightenment. It reflects the western elite cultural values of the upper middle and upper white groups, constitutes the charter and basic principles of international heritage protection today, and to a great extent influences the formulation of laws and policies in the field of cultural relics in China. In China's theory and practice of protection, there are problems such as misreading authoritative heritage discourse, blind submission and underdevelopment of local discourse, which cause confusion in theory and lack of acceptance in practice. To some extent, it damaged the local historical memory and values. This research will use the historical research method, the multi-disciplinary visual field analysis, the comparative research and so on method, first carries on the research from the etymology and the etymological meaning angle to "the historic site", "the heritage" and so on architectural heritage protection domain related word interpretation and the understanding aspect, Explore the meaning of the above words and the meaning in the field of architectural heritage protection; Secondly, it discusses the development of western authoritative heritage discourse, as well as the comparative analysis of Chinese and Western traditional heritage values. To clarify the truth of western authoritative heritage discourse, to find its localization expression, to study the value orientation and discourse system of Chinese traditional architecture, and to reflect on the problems existing in the concept of protection since modern times, so as to reconstruct the contemporary Chinese characteristics. The theoretical system of protection to solve China's practical problems establishes and provides the theoretical foundation and basis.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G122
本文编号：2427156
[Abstract]:"authoritative Heritage discourse" emphasizes the authenticity, materiality, monumental, historical, artistic and scientific value of the heritage, which embodies the modern historical view and cultural thinking logic since the Western Enlightenment. It reflects the western elite cultural values of the upper middle and upper white groups, constitutes the charter and basic principles of international heritage protection today, and to a great extent influences the formulation of laws and policies in the field of cultural relics in China. In China's theory and practice of protection, there are problems such as misreading authoritative heritage discourse, blind submission and underdevelopment of local discourse, which cause confusion in theory and lack of acceptance in practice. To some extent, it damaged the local historical memory and values. This research will use the historical research method, the multi-disciplinary visual field analysis, the comparative research and so on method, first carries on the research from the etymology and the etymological meaning angle to "the historic site", "the heritage" and so on architectural heritage protection domain related word interpretation and the understanding aspect, Explore the meaning of the above words and the meaning in the field of architectural heritage protection; Secondly, it discusses the development of western authoritative heritage discourse, as well as the comparative analysis of Chinese and Western traditional heritage values. To clarify the truth of western authoritative heritage discourse, to find its localization expression, to study the value orientation and discourse system of Chinese traditional architecture, and to reflect on the problems existing in the concept of protection since modern times, so as to reconstruct the contemporary Chinese characteristics. The theoretical system of protection to solve China's practical problems establishes and provides the theoretical foundation and basis.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G122
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 路方芳;齐一聪;;基于日本文化财登录制度对中国文化遗产保护制度的思考[J];安徽农业科学;2011年30期
2 阮仪三;冷眼看热潮——申报世界遗产和保护历史文化遗存[J];城市规划汇刊;2000年06期
3 胡海胜;唐代剑;;文化景观研究回顾与展望[J];地理与地理信息科学;2006年05期
4 朱煜杰;;中西遗产保护比较的几点思考:一个跨文化的视角[J];东南文化;2011年03期
5 赵红梅;;论遗产的价值[J];东南文化;2011年05期
6 吴凌鸥;;日本文化财保护体系解析[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2009年06期
7 喻学才;;中国建筑遗产保护传统的研究[J];华中建筑;2008年02期
8 喻学才;;中国古代的遗产保护实践述略[J];华中建筑;2008年03期
9 喻学才;;孔子的遗产观[J];华中建筑;2008年04期
10 喻学才;;康有为的遗产保护思想[J];华中建筑;2008年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 黄明玉;文化遗产的价值评估及记录建档[D];复旦大学;2009年
2 程圩;文化遗产旅游价值认知的中西方差异研究[D];陕西师范大学;2009年
本文编号：2427156
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/2427156.html
