跨越国界的历史认识——顾若鹏《从人到鬼,从鬼到人:日本战争罪行与中国审判》读后

发布时间：2018-02-14 20:26

本文关键词： 战犯审判战争罪行太原审判伯力审判历史认识谷寿夫审判日本战犯掷弹筒弹酒井隆新中国政府 　出处：《抗日战争研究》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正战后盟国对日本战犯进行了大规模的审判,其中包括设立在东京的远东国际军事法庭对甲级战犯的审判,以及盟国在亚太地区设立的法庭对乙丙级战犯的审判。除此以外,还包括与上述审判不在同一法理体系和框架的日本战犯审判,如苏联主导的伯力审判和1949年后新中国政府主导的沈阳和太原审判。(1)战后对日本战犯的审判,由于涉及战争责任的确定和国际正义的实现等"大义名分"问题,一直以来都被视为中日两国"历史纠葛"的源头。相对而言,学界对各盟国主导的乙丙级战犯审判的关注,远不如对甲级战犯的国际审判。此外,相对于中日两国学界,西方学界对战后
[Abstract]:After the war, Japan's war criminals were tried on a large scale by allies, including the trial of Class A war criminals by the International military Tribunal for the far East in Tokyo, and the trial of Class B and C war criminals by a court set up by the allies in the Asia-Pacific region. It also includes the trials of Japanese war criminals that are not in the same legal system and framework as the above-mentioned trials, such as the Soviet-led trial of Boli and the post-#date0# trial of Shenyang and Taiyuan, led by the New Chinese Government, and the trial of Japanese war criminals after the war. Because of the issues such as the determination of war responsibility and the realization of international justice, and so on, they have all along been regarded as the source of "historical disputes" between China and Japan. Relatively speaking, scholars have paid close attention to the trials of war criminals of Class B and C led by various allies. It is far worse than international trials of Class-A war criminals. In addition, compared with the academic circles of China and Japan, Western scholars have a very good view of the post-war war.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“抗战胜利后国民政府对日本战犯审判研究”(15ZDB046)的中期成果之一
【分类号】：K153-5

【相似文献】