元代州判官兼捕盗考述——从两方“州判官兼捕盗

发布时间：2018-01-27 07:46

本文关键词： 元代州判官捕盗　出处：《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2014年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：官方文献记载的州判官兼领捕盗的制度并不完全符合相关制度的具体运作。州判官兼捕盗之职主要设于无属县之州。元代不少县直接改为州,此种背景下,州判官兼捕盗成为具有元朝特色的制度,其在维护地方治安方面的作用亦较为彰显。目前发现的两方元代"州判官兼捕盗印",进一步印证和补充了元代州判官兼捕盗制度。
[Abstract]:The official document records the system of the state judge and the capture of theft does not fully accord with the specific operation of the relevant system. The duty of the state judge and the thief is mainly located in the state without county. Many counties in Yuan Dynasty changed directly to the state under this background. State judge and arrest theft has become a system with the characteristics of the Yuan Dynasty, its role in maintaining local public order is also more prominent. Further confirmed and supplemented the Yuan Dynasty state judge and arrest theft system.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“元代官制研究:基于元代官方印章的考察”(13CZS015)
【分类号】：K247
【正文快照】： 《辽上京文物撷英》一书收有一方在内蒙古赤峰市巴林左旗哈达英格乡石房子村出土的“宝昌州判官兼捕盗印”。该印铜质,方形,边长5.6厘米,长方形板纽,纽顶刻“上”字,通高6.6厘米。印面为三行八思巴蒙古字。印背,右刻印面文字的对音汉字“宝昌州判官兼捕盗印”,左刻“中书礼部

【参考文献】