满族汉化:对新清史族群视角的质疑

发布时间：2018-05-06 11:09

本文选题：满族汉化 + 新清史　；参考：《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年03期

【摘要】：清史学界传统的"汉化"说近年来由于美国新清史学派的挑战,在西方主流学界已濒于式微。然而,这一学术进展却源自新清史对"汉化"极度狭隘的界定。新清史强调的满族族群认同的始终存在以及清末的反满浪潮,很大程度上均可以普世的、单一民族统治下都普遍存在的"反政府"、官民两大群体在社会功能性上的区别和对抗来解释,无须以"民族冲突"、"族群"视角理解之;此两种现象与满族汉化毫不矛盾;清代的民族压迫、社会地位以民族属性划分的传统史观,忽略了统治阶级、既得利益集团的优势积累效应,应该得到修正。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the traditional "Sinicization" theory of Qing historiography has been on the verge of decline in the mainstream of the West due to the challenge of the New Qing History School in the United States. However, this academic progress stems from the extremely narrow definition of Sinicization in the new Qing history. The historical emphasis of the new Qing Dynasty on the consistent existence of Manchu ethnic identity and the anti-Manchu tide in the late Qing Dynasty can to a large extent be universal. "Anti-government", which exists generally under the rule of a single nationality, is explained by the differences and confrontations between the two groups in the social function, which need not be understood from the perspective of "ethnic conflict" and "ethnic group", and these two phenomena are not in contradiction with Manchu's Sinicization; The traditional historical view of national oppression and social status divided by national attributes in the Qing Dynasty ignored the advantage accumulation effect of the ruling class and vested interest groups and should be revised.
【作者单位】：深圳大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：K249

【相似文献】