竹林七贤拙论

发布时间：2018-05-16 02:12

本文选题：竹林七贤 + 嵇康　；参考：《史学月刊》2014年11期

【摘要】：竹林七贤作为一个群体,显然是被当作正面人物加以肯定的,否则何以称为"七贤"?但笔者认为,对竹林七贤不宜作整体的评介,而应根据其个人政绩、业绩作出单独的评价。对其作个人评价时,不应以曹魏政权或司马氏政权为依归。因为这两个都属于篡夺来的政权,在他们掌权初期,都施行过一些有利于社会发展的政策和诛杀异己的行为,在两个政权的晚期都趋于腐朽,两者难分轩轾。故对竹林七贤个人的评价,拥魏者,可以肯定他的气节;拥晋者,可以肯定他是忠臣。据此构想,肯定嵇康的忠魏气节,山涛对晋的忠心。对向秀则肯定他在学术方面的贡献。对阮籍既肯定他在学术方面的贡献,也指出他玩忽职守及败坏礼教的丑行。对王戎则批评他是贪财好利的腐朽的官僚。对阮咸和刘伶,则批评他们是为己避祸而又自矜风雅的俗人。
[Abstract]:As a group, the seven sages of bamboo forests are clearly regarded as positive figures. Otherwise, why are they called "seven sages"?. However, the author believes that it is not appropriate to make an overall review of the seven sages of bamboo forests, but to make a separate evaluation according to their personal achievements and achievements. When making personal evaluation, should not take Cao Wei regime or Sima regime as the result. Because these two are usurped regimes, in their early years in power, they have carried out some policies conducive to social development and to kill others, in the late stage of both regimes tend to decay, the two can not distinguish between the two. Therefore, the personal evaluation of the seven sages of bamboo forest, support Wei, can confirm his integrity; support Jin, can be sure that he is a loyal minister. According to this conception, affirmed Ji Kang's loyalty to Wei Qi and Shan Tao's loyalty to Jin. Xiang Xiuzi acknowledged his academic contributions. Ruan Ji both affirmed his academic contributions, but also pointed out that he dereliction of duty and bad manners. Wang Jung was criticized as a corrupt and corrupt bureaucrat. To Ruan Xian and Liu Ling, they are vulgar people who avoid evil for their own sake.
【作者单位】：河南大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K235

【共引文献】