西汉授田制废止问题辨正——兼谈张家山汉简《二年律令》授田制的历史实践问题

发布时间：2018-06-07 13:59

本文选题：二年律令 + 授田制　；参考：《人文杂志》2015年01期

【摘要】："复故爵田宅"诏表明西汉继续秦朝授田制,刘邦时代不存在授田困难问题。《二年律令》是现实施行的法律而非"一纸空文";汉文帝"不为民田及奴婢为限"不等于在制度上废止授田制;汉武帝"田宅逾制"之"制"是汉初旧制而非武帝新立之制。郑玄"汉无授田之制"有其特定含义,均不足以否定西汉授田制的存在。西汉授田制系因土地私有化的发展而逐步退出历史舞台,而非因某一位帝王的某项政策而废止,更不能因为土地兼并而否定《二年律令》授田制的历史存在。
[Abstract]:"the retelling of the old Jutian House" shows that the Western Han Dynasty continued the system of granting farmland in the Qin Dynasty. In the era of Liu Bang, there was no difficulty in granting land. < 2 years' decree was a practical law, not "a piece of paper", the Han Emperor's "not limited for the land and slaves" did not mean that the system of granting land should be abolished in the system. The "system" of Wu Emperor in Han Dynasty was the old system in the early Han Dynasty, not the new system of Wu Emperor. Zheng Xuan's system without granting farmland in Han Dynasty has its specific meaning, which is not enough to negate the existence of granting farmland system in the Western Han Dynasty. The land grant system of the Western Han Dynasty was gradually withdrawn from the historical stage because of the development of land privatization, not because of a certain monarch's policy, nor could it be denied the existence of the land grant system because of land annexation.
【作者单位】：苏州大学社会学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“简牍与秦汉服役研究”(08BZS005)
【分类号】：K234.1

【相似文献】