《唐会要》研究
发布时间:2018-07-10 09:01
本文选题:王溥 + 《唐会要》 ; 参考:《厦门大学》2008年博士论文
【摘要】: 绪论,首先阐明选题意义,指出《唐会要》对于包括社会经济史在内的唐史研究具有很高的史料价值和史学价值,因此本文从运用唐代社会经济基本史料的实际需要出发,从文献学的角度对《唐会要》作比较系统、全面地研究,对于促进唐代社会经济史料的基础研究当有裨益。接着作学术史回顾,说明基本思路、研究方法、拟创新与不足之处。 第一章首先考述苏冕、苏弁的生平事迹。认为苏冕是典章制度专家、家富藏书,加上发展新体裁的典章制度专书是当时史学发展的一个大方向,在这样的背景和条件下,苏冕在继承《周礼》、《春秋》、纪传体书志等前代史书的基础上,撰成历史上第一部会要体史书,开创了会要体史书这一新的史书体裁。 第二章主要考证《续会要》诸修撰官的生平事迹,编撰始末、内容的截止时间,崔铉是否实际参与《续会要》修撰工作等问题。认为从已知《续会要》原文来看,《续会要》的体例基本承自苏冕《会要》。 第三章先从《宋史·王溥传》驳正辑补、王溥的“茂学懿文”和学术交游三个方面考述王溥生平事迹。继而考察《唐会要》的成书,指出《唐会要》保留了《会要》门类的主体,大部分史料取自《会要》、《续会要》,王溥对这些史料进行了整理,但不是很深入。《唐会要》也有一定的创新,从《会要》、《续会要》到《唐会要》,会要体史书的体例、编撰思想有所变化。王溥新增入宣宗以后的典章制度,保存史料之功不可没。 第四章主要考察唐宋以来会要体史书的发展,指出:官修会要体史书始于《续会要》,《宋会要》是官修会要体史书的高峰。私撰会要体史书始于苏冕《会要》,宋代徐天麟两汉《会要》更多采用苏冕《会要》旧例,清代出现私撰会要体史书的高潮,体例在徐天麟之书的基础上又有所发展。 第五章分别论述学界尚未深入研究的《唐会要》史料来源问题;补充论述关于《唐会要》的版本流传以及通行的几个《唐会要》版本的优劣等问题。 第六章先以经济史料为例,对《唐会要》经济史料的错误类型、致误原因进行分析;再以《群书考索后集》中的《会要》佚文与上海古籍版《唐会要》对校、以四库本与上海古籍版《唐会要》对校,探讨校读《唐会要》的几种方法。认为对校不同版本异同的对校法,仍是校读《唐会要》的基本方法。同时,利用《唐会要》本书互证的本校法,以他书证本书的他校法、以出土文物校传世文献都是适用的校勘法。《唐会要》涉及的典章制度类型非常广泛,校勘需要掌握比较深入的各项专门知识,由于一个人的学识有限,充分利用今人论著中关于唐代典章制度的研究成果,也是校勘《唐会要》不可或缺的一个重要方法。
[Abstract]:Introduction, first of all, it clarifies the significance of selecting the topic, and points out that the Tang Dynasty will have high historical data value and historical value for the study of Tang history, including the social and economic history. Therefore, this paper starts from the practical need of using the basic historical data of the Tang Dynasty social economy. From the perspective of philology, it is beneficial to make a comparative systematic and comprehensive study on Tang Dynasty's social and economic historical materials in order to promote the basic research of the social and economic historical materials of the Tang Dynasty. Then review the academic history, explain the basic ideas, research methods, innovation and shortcomings. The first chapter discusses the life of Su Mian and Su Bian. It is believed that Su Mian was an expert in the system of canon, that Jiafu had a collection of books, and that the special book on the system of rules and regulations, which developed a new genre, was a major direction of the development of historiography at that time. Under such a background and conditions, On the basis of inheriting the historical books such as Zhou Li, Spring and Autumn period and chronicles, Su Mian made up the first historical book in history, which created a new genre of historical books. The second chapter mainly studies the life story of the officials, the compilation time, the deadline of the content, and whether Choi Hyun actually participated in the work. It is considered that the style of "resumed session" is basically inherited from Su's crown. The third chapter discusses Wang Pu's life story from three aspects: Wang Pu's biography of Song Dynasty, Wang Pu's Mao Xue Yi Wen and academic friendship. Then, by examining the finished book of the Tang Dynasty, it was pointed out that the Tang Dynasty wanted to keep the main body of the category of "will want", and most of the historical materials were taken from "will want >," to be resumed ", and Wang Pu collated these historical materials. But it is not very deep. There are also some innovations in the Tang Dynasty, from "will want", "reconvened" to "Tang will want", will need the style of historical books, and the compilation of ideas has changed. Wang Pu added into the Xuanzong after the system of laws and regulations, the preservation of historical data can not be ignored. The fourth chapter mainly studies the development of the history books since the Tang and Song dynasties, and points out that the official revision Association wants the body history books to begin with, and the Song Dynasty Association wants to be the peak of the official practice associations to the body history books. The society of private writing began with Su Mian, and the Han Dynasty of Xu Tianlin in Song Dynasty more adopted the old example. In the Qing Dynasty, there appeared the climax of the private writing society and the style developed on the basis of Xu Tianlin's book. The fifth chapter deals with the sources of historical materials which have not been thoroughly studied by the academic circles, and the issues of the spread of the versions and the advantages and disadvantages of the popular versions. The sixth chapter takes the economic historical data as an example to analyze the wrong types of economic historical materials and the causes of the errors, and then uses the "will want to" in "the later Collection of Qun Books" and the Shanghai Ancient Book Edition "Tang will want" to check the school. In this paper, the author discusses several methods of reading "Tang meeting" by using Siku Ben and Shanghai Ancient Book Edition. It is considered that the method of correcting the differences and similarities of different versions is still the basic method of reading Tang Dynasty. At the same time, it is applicable to use the "Tang Dynasty" book to prove each other's school method, his book "other school method", and the unearthed cultural relics school to pass on documents. [the] Tang Dynasty will involve a wide range of rules and regulations. Collation needs to master more in-depth specialized knowledge. Due to a person's limited knowledge, it is also an indispensable and important method to make full use of the research results of the Tang Dynasty rules and regulations system in the modern people's works.
【学位授予单位】:厦门大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:K242
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 瞿林东;苏冕与《会要》——为会要体史书创立1200周年而作[J];安徽大学学报;2003年05期
2 周少川;约论会要体史籍[J];北京师范大学学报;1989年05期
3 邢永革;《唐会要》版本考略[J];中国典籍与文化;2004年02期
4 邢永革;《唐会要》成书考略[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2004年04期
5 陈冠明;《唐会要》人名校考[J];古籍整理研究学刊;1994年01期
6 蒲向明;;王仁裕生平著作考[J];甘肃高师学报;2006年03期
7 邢永革;;《唐会要》正文错误类型及成因探析[J];菏泽学院学报;2006年04期
8 何振作;简述扈蒙对宋初文化建设的贡献[J];江西社会科学;1997年11期
9 朱仲玉;王溥和会要体史书[J];晋阳学刊;1985年06期
10 郭金彬;陈玲;;中国古典科技思想史料的搜集、整理和研究——以《唐会要》为例[J];科学技术与辩证法;2006年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李志红;唐长安城市景观研究[D];郑州大学;2006年
,本文编号:2112875
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2112875.html