突破史料和家法之局限——对宋代政治史研究的一点思考

发布时间：2018-07-13 16:11

【摘要】：正对于中国学者来说,因历史研究由传统向现代转变较迟,又先后遭逢艰危之政局,故政治史一直作为历史研究特别是本国史研究的恒久性主题,而且研究之议题亦相对狭窄。这一状况尤以中国大陆为突出。尽管在西方史学主流中,随着年鉴学派的兴起,经济史和社会史曾长期取代政治史的主导地位,但在中国史学中政治史却仍然保持其重要地位及其特殊性。世纪之交,政治史再度成为世界史学重视的主题,中国政治史研究因应其中,开始呈现新的热潮。作为中国政治史组成部分的宋代政治史研究尤为引人注目,成为近年宋史研究的重要牵动力。其研究理路先后经历了"走向活的制度史"和"新政治史"阶段(黄宽重:《从活的制度史迈向新的政治
[Abstract]:For Chinese scholars, because of the late transition from traditional to modern history, political history has been regarded as the permanent theme of historical research, especially in China, and the research topic is relatively narrow. This situation is especially prominent in mainland China. Although in the mainstream of western historiography, with the rise of yearbook school, economic history and social history have replaced the dominant position of political history for a long time, political history still maintains its important position and particularity in Chinese historiography. At the turn of the century, political history has once again become the theme of world historiography, in which Chinese political history studies have begun to take on a new upsurge. As a part of Chinese political history, the study of Song Dynasty's political history is particularly noticeable and has become an important driving force in the research of Song's history in recent years. His research has gone through the stages of "moving towards a living institutional history" and "a new political history" (Huang Kuan-zong: < moving from living Institutional History to New Politics
【作者单位】：中山大学历史学系;
【基金】：北京大学中国古代史研究中心教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“宋代政治史研究的新视野”(11JJD770004)成果之一
【分类号】：D691;K244

【相似文献】