恐惧与话语权——唐代“蛊毒”研究的新视角
发布时间：2018-07-29 11:25
【摘要】：从汉至唐,官方都将施蛊和畜蛊定为重罪,唐律将"造畜蛊毒"视为十恶不赦之罪,这种法律上的重视折射出社会对蛊毒的恐惧。中蛊毒者会受到痛苦的折磨,而且时间长短不一,同时存在的高死亡率更加深了人们对蛊毒的恐惧。汉唐间医籍记载了蛊毒的诸多内容,通过这些翔实的材料可以确知医者掌握对蛊毒的话语权。与之相反,巫者对此话语权掌握的情况,史料并没有给予直接支撑,但从"巫医分离"的角度,侧面窥探唐代巫者的医疗身份,可知唐代的巫者对于蛊毒也拥有一定的话语权。
[Abstract]:From the Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, the officials regarded the use of spanking and animal poisoning as felonies, and Tang Law regarded the crime of "making animal poison" as a heinous crime, which reflected the society's fear of it. The people suffering from the poison are suffering for different periods of time, and the high death rate increases the people's fear of the poison. The medical books of Han and Tang dynasties recorded many contents of Gu du, and through these detailed materials, we can know that the doctor has the right to speak to the poison. On the contrary, the witchcraft did not give direct support to the situation of the right to speak, but from the angle of "separation of the witch doctor", the medical identity of the witchcraft in the Tang Dynasty was explored, and it can be seen that the witch in the Tang Dynasty also had a certain right of speech to the voodoo.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院;中国人民大学唐宋史研究中心;
【分类号】：K242
本文编号：2152531
[Abstract]:From the Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, the officials regarded the use of spanking and animal poisoning as felonies, and Tang Law regarded the crime of "making animal poison" as a heinous crime, which reflected the society's fear of it. The people suffering from the poison are suffering for different periods of time, and the high death rate increases the people's fear of the poison. The medical books of Han and Tang dynasties recorded many contents of Gu du, and through these detailed materials, we can know that the doctor has the right to speak to the poison. On the contrary, the witchcraft did not give direct support to the situation of the right to speak, but from the angle of "separation of the witch doctor", the medical identity of the witchcraft in the Tang Dynasty was explored, and it can be seen that the witch in the Tang Dynasty also had a certain right of speech to the voodoo.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院;中国人民大学唐宋史研究中心;
【分类号】：K242
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 连立昌;;畜蛊杀人辨析[J];社会科学战线;1983年02期
2 田东奎;明清律典中的巫术犯罪[J];唐都学刊;2005年01期
3 李荣华;;隋代“巫蛊之术”新探[J];五邑大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
4 卢向前;;武则天“畏猫说”与隋室“猫鬼之狱”[J];文史知识;2006年05期
5 李荣华;;“南方本多毒,北客恒惧侵”:略论唐代文人的岭南意象[J];鄱阳湖学刊;2010年05期
6 卢向前;;武则天“畏猫说”与隋室“猫鬼之狱”[J];中国史研究;2006年01期
7 牛继清;《北史》系时讹误拾遗[J];中国史研究;2002年01期
8 刘洋;;汉代“不道”罪考论[J];安徽教育学院学报;2006年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 高颂;隋唐“蛊”现象探析[D];青海师范大学;2010年
2 温玉珍;《岭外代答》与南宋广西民俗[D];广西民族大学;2012年
，本文编号：2152531
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2152531.html
