司马迁、桑弘羊经济思想比较研究
发布时间：2018-10-12 17:32
【摘要】：司马迁与桑弘羊，同处西汉武帝时代，是这一时期杰出的经济思想家。作为史学家的司马迁能够比较客观地观察社会经济生活并真实地载入史册；而作为商人之后的桑弘羊则能深刻领悟商业经营之道，并且把它运用于国家经济管理之中，他们的经济思想堪称西汉中期最具影响力和代表性的经济思想。可以说，西汉社会经济的繁荣与发展，特别是商品货币经济的发展为司马迁、桑弘羊经济思想之形成提供了社会经济土壤，使得他们对社会经济发展的一些问题有着近似的认识和总结，但由于出身、入仕、承袭学派以及所处立场的不同又使得他们在对待西汉中期伴随着经济发展而暴露出的社会矛盾表现出迥异认识，，集中体现在国民经济管理的主张上背道而驰，即自由发展与国家干预两种管理模式之争。到目前为止，分别研究两位历史人物经济观点、财政措施的文章层出不穷，但鲜有文章把两人同时置于西汉武帝时代的历史转折背景下，系统论述两种经济思想，并比较和分析这两种经济思想产生的经济、政治、文化条件以及对中国封建社会的深远影响。鉴于此，我想通过本文对以上问题进行探讨。比较这两种经济思想的异同，能够准确地分析西汉社会政治、经济以及思想领域的发展与变化；有助于深刻理解我国古代经济思想发展的脉络，同时也是对这两位思想家个案研究的深化。
[Abstract]:Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang were the outstanding economic thinkers of the Western Han Dynasty. As a historian, Si Maqian was able to observe social and economic life more objectively and truly go down in history. As a businessman, Sang Hong-yang was able to deeply understand the way of business management and apply it to the economic management of the country. Their economic thought can be rated as the most influential and representative economic thought in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. It can be said that the prosperity and development of the social economy of the Western Han Dynasty, especially the development of the commodity monetary economy, provided the social and economic soil for the formation of Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang's economic thought. So that they have similar understanding and summary of some problems of social and economic development, but because of their origin, they become official. The inheritance school and their different positions made them show different understanding of the social contradictions exposed along with the economic development in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty, and concentrated on the idea of national economic management. Namely free development and state intervention two kinds of management mode dispute. Up to now, the economic viewpoints of two historical figures have been studied separately, and the articles on fiscal measures have emerged in endlessly, but few articles have systematically discussed the two kinds of economic thoughts under the historical turning point background of the Western Han Dynasty. And compare and analyze the economic, political, cultural conditions and the profound influence on the feudal society of China. In view of this, I would like to discuss the above issues through this article. Comparing the similarities and differences between these two economic thoughts can accurately analyze the development and changes of the political, economic and ideological fields of the Western Han Dynasty, and contribute to a profound understanding of the context of the development of the ancient economic thoughts in China. At the same time, it is the deepening of the case study of these two thinkers.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K234.1
[Abstract]:Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang were the outstanding economic thinkers of the Western Han Dynasty. As a historian, Si Maqian was able to observe social and economic life more objectively and truly go down in history. As a businessman, Sang Hong-yang was able to deeply understand the way of business management and apply it to the economic management of the country. Their economic thought can be rated as the most influential and representative economic thought in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. It can be said that the prosperity and development of the social economy of the Western Han Dynasty, especially the development of the commodity monetary economy, provided the social and economic soil for the formation of Si Maqian and Sang Hongyang's economic thought. So that they have similar understanding and summary of some problems of social and economic development, but because of their origin, they become official. The inheritance school and their different positions made them show different understanding of the social contradictions exposed along with the economic development in the middle of the Western Han Dynasty, and concentrated on the idea of national economic management. Namely free development and state intervention two kinds of management mode dispute. Up to now, the economic viewpoints of two historical figures have been studied separately, and the articles on fiscal measures have emerged in endlessly, but few articles have systematically discussed the two kinds of economic thoughts under the historical turning point background of the Western Han Dynasty. And compare and analyze the economic, political, cultural conditions and the profound influence on the feudal society of China. In view of this, I would like to discuss the above issues through this article. Comparing the similarities and differences between these two economic thoughts can accurately analyze the development and changes of the political, economic and ideological fields of the Western Han Dynasty, and contribute to a profound understanding of the context of the development of the ancient economic thoughts in China. At the same time, it is the deepening of the case study of these two thinkers.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K234.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶小草;《杜周传》与“司马迁去世的时间”[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年03期
2 宋光辉;;儒法经济思想的对立与统一:一个西汉的案例[J];世界经济情况;2008年12期
3 鹿
本文编号：2266996
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2266996.html
