《碧琳琅丛书》本《金氏尚书注》十二卷伪作补考

发布时间：2018-11-04 18:51

【摘要】：金履祥为宋季元初之大学者,其学师事王柏,为朱熹嫡脉四传。其经学、史学、考证之学皆有极深造诣。金氏经学以《尚书》为大宗,其《资治通鉴前编》即据《尚书》为架构所成之代表性巨著。金氏《尚书》学说之专著,传于今者盖有二焉:《尚书注》十二卷,其一也;《尚书表注》二卷,其二也。《尚书表注》一书乃金氏晚岁定说,绝无可疑;至于《尚书注》十二卷,《经义考》引张云章序文,谓此书乃仁山早岁所为章释句解之《尚书》注,晚后掇其要而为《表注》。后之传是篇者,类皆沿此论述。然其说无所凭据,可疑之甚。本人尝著《金履祥〈尚书注〉十二卷考异》一文,以《尚书注》十二卷(据陆心源《十万卷楼丛书本》)对比金氏《尚书表注》、《资治通鉴前编》,以及《仁山集》中论及《尚书》事之文,已经确证金履祥《尚书注》,实乃后之伪作者拼凑掇辑金氏《资治通鉴前编》中所述《尚书》学说而成之伪作,借金氏少作之名以售其欺蒙之计。2011年,台湾有许育龙君据本人研究之启发,并得悉号称金氏《尚书注》十二卷者,尚有方功惠《碧琳琅馆丛书》本之《尚书金氏注》十二卷,而此本与《十万卷楼丛书》本内容差异极大。进而考得《碧琳琅本》亦为伪作,乃据元朝陈师凯《书蔡传旁通》为底本,外加与金氏相关文献材料,前后拼凑为序跋,鱼目以售其欺。许君以所得撰《〈碧琳琅馆丛书〉本〈金氏尚书注〉著者考疑》一文,既刊登矣。其结论谓此书当是清代中叶之后人所伪作。许君所考论,徇可信矣,然其中尚有多项关键材料未能厘清。本论文即进为之补考,并推论伪作嫌疑者之可能。
[Abstract]:Jin Luxiang is a great scholar in the early Yuan Dynasty of Song Dynasty. His studies of classics, history, and textual research all have profound attainments. Jin's Classics takes Shang Shu as a major part, and its "Zizhitong Jian" is a representative masterpiece based on the framework of Shang Shu. The monographs of Jin's "Shang Shu" theory have been spread to the present, there are two kinds of works: "Shang Shu Note" 12 volumes, one volume; "Shang Shu Table Note" 2 volumes, second also. "Shang Shu Table Note" is Kim's late age theory, and there is absolutely no doubt; As for the 12 volumes of Shang Shu, the textual examination of the Jing Yi cited Zhang Yunzhang's preface, saying that this book was a note for the interpretation of Zhang's sentences in the early years of Renshan's early life, but later it was called "Table Note". The latter biography is written along this line. However, its claim has no evidence, is very suspicious. I have tasted the article "Jin Luxiang's Note on Shang Shu" 12 volumes of textual Research and differences, and contrasted Jin's "Shang Shu Table Note" with "Shang Shu Note" 12 volumes (according to Lu Xinyuan < 100,000 Book Series), "Zizhitong Jianjian", And the article on the matter of "Shang Shu" in "Ren Shan Ji" has confirmed that Jin Luxiang's "Shang Shu Notes", in fact, was compiled by the pseudo-authors of Jin's "Shang Shu" theory as described in Jin's "Zizhitong Jian Qianqian". In 2011, Hsu Yulong, inspired by his own research, learned that there were 12 volumes of Kim's "Shang Shu Notes", and there were still 12 volumes of "Shang Shu's Notes" by Fang Kwan-hui [Bilin Lang Guang Guan]. And this book and < 100, 000 volumes of books] this content is very different. Then obtained that "Bilinlang Ben" is also a fake, according to the Yuan Dynasty Chen Shikai "book Cai Zhuan Bantong" as the base, plus the relevant documents and Kim materials, together with the preface and postscript, fish to sell their deceiving. Xu Jun wrote "Bilin Langguan series" this "Jin Shang Shu Note" the author of an article, published. The conclusion is that this book was written by people after the middle Qing Dynasty. Xu Jun's theory is credible, but there are a number of key materials can not be clarified. This thesis is a reexamination and deduces the possibility of false suspects.
【作者单位】：台湾高雄师范大学经学研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD155)
【分类号】：G256

【共引文献】