屠本《十六国春秋》“四燕录”史料探源

发布时间：2018-12-13 06:28

【摘要】：屠本《十六国春秋》托名为北魏崔鸿著,实为明代屠乔孙著。不过,这部书名伪而实非伪,应该说是一部有据可查的史书。该书内容基本出自《晋书》、《资治通鉴》、《太平御览》、《魏书》、《北史》、《水经注》、《古今刀剑录》、《初学记》、《小名录》、《北堂书钞》等书,所涉史籍近二十种。通过屠本"四燕录"与其它史籍对读,再经过详细统计可知,屠本未见准确出处者仅占"四燕录"内容的约1㳠。根据屠本言之有据的写作风格,可以说这约1㳠无出处者也应有所本,或所涉之史籍已亡佚,现已无法查找;或是我们功力未到,尚未找到出处罢了。总之,屠本是一部内容有据的史书,而且它将纷繁的史籍、史料集为一书,为学者们研究"四燕"史乃至十六国史提供了极大方便,这就是屠本为十六国史研究作出的重要贡献。
[Abstract]:The Butcher was named Cui Hong in the Northern Wei Dynasty, but was actually written by Qiao Sun in Ming Dynasty. However, the title of the book is false and not false, should be said to be a documented history book. The contents of the book basically come from "Jin Shu", "Zi Zhi Tong Jian", "Taiping Imperial Book", "Wei Shu", "Northern History", "Water Classical Notes", "Ancient and Modern Sword Records", "beginners' Records", "small list", "Beitang Book banknote", etc. There are nearly twenty kinds of historical records involved. Through reading the butcher's "four Yan Lu" with other historical books, and through detailed statistics, it can be seen that the butcher who has not found the exact source only accounts for about 1 ~ (th) of the "four Yan Lu" content. According to Turimoto's well-founded writing style, can this be said to be about 1? Those who have no source should have something to offer, or the historical records involved have been lost and cannot be found; or we have not yet been able to find a source. In a word, Tataben is a well-documented historical book, and it provides a great convenience for scholars to study the history of the "four Yan" and even the history of the sixteen Kingdoms by turning the numerous historical books and historical materials into one book. This is an important contribution that Turimoto made to the study of the history of the sixteen states.
【作者单位】：陕西师范大学历史文化学院;西华师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K235

【参考文献】