版式分工与注、评共生的博弈——谈明代《文

发布时间:2019-06-22 15:22
【摘要】:明人删削《文选》李善注和五臣注,并加己意增述而成明代《文选》删述本,删述者(或者是出版者)认识到五臣注与评点的相通之处与可转化性,在此基础上对注和评的职能产生明确的分工意识,落实到版本特征上表现为以版面位置规定职能分工。随着版式的约定俗成,位置反过来表达甚至决定职能,以至于评和注的某些内容很难区分。注释文本和评点文本二者的交集——导读内容及其指南性证明了注与评的共生状态,以及明代《文选》删述本的大众读本的性质。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty deleted Li Shan's note and the five minister's note, and added his own intention to add his own meaning to the deleted text of the Ming Dynasty. The abridder (or publisher) realized the similarities and translatability between the notes and the comments of the five courtiers. On this basis, the functions of the notes and comments produced a clear sense of division of labor, and the implementation of the version characteristics showed that the division of functions was defined by the layout position. With the convention of layout, the position in turn expresses or even determines the function, so that some of the contents of the comment and the note are difficult to distinguish. The intersection of the explanatory text and the comment text, the guided reading content and its guidance, prove the symbiotic state of the note and the evaluation, as well as the nature of the popular reading book of the deleted text in the Ming Dynasty.
【作者单位】: 国家清史纂修领导小组办公室;
【基金】:北京大学博士研究生出国研究项目基金资助
【分类号】:K248;G256


本文编号:2504708

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2504708.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6131e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com