晚清商办铁路抵制外资的法制建构及其实效

发布时间：2018-01-16 13:06

本文关键词：晚清商办铁路抵制外资的法制建构及其实效　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在收回利权运动中创办的各省商办铁路公司,将限制或禁止外国资本的规定列入公司章程,并获得国家行政的支持,但宏大的爱国叙事并不关注具体的制度构建,从各类章程"不入洋股"、"不借洋债"等零散表述中透出的爱国情怀,却不敌资金匮乏的现实,这些限制性规定最终成为空文。某种程度上,政府通过国家立法限制商办铁路公司私入洋股、擅借外债,而商办铁路公司则利用公司章程抵制国家借用外债,国家法律和公司章程成为双方相互抵制的工具。在具体操作中,政府和商办铁路公司都在抵制对方对外融资的同时又以外国资本作为解脱自身困境的出路。
[Abstract]:The provincial commercial railway companies, which were founded in the recovery movement, included in the articles of association the provisions restricting or prohibiting foreign capital and received the support of the state administration. But the grand patriotic narration does not pay attention to the concrete system construction, from the various kinds of articles of association "does not enter the foreign stock", "does not borrow the foreign debt" and so on the scattered expression to reveal the patriotic sentiment, but does not match the reality which the fund lacks. To some extent, the government adopted national legislation to restrict commercial railway companies from importing foreign shares and borrowing foreign debts, while commercial railway companies used their articles of association to resist the borrowing of foreign debts by the state. The national laws and articles of association have become the tools of mutual resistance. In the concrete operation, both the government and the commercial railway company are resisting the other party's external financing, while taking foreign capital as the way out of their own predicament at the same time.
【作者单位】：河南工业大学法学院;
【基金】：河南工业大学高层次人才基金“清末铁路借款法律问题研究”(2013BS025)
【分类号】：K252
【正文快照】： 现代意义上的外资包括境外资金、技术、设备等资本形式,晚清主要从资金角度关注外资,多称洋款、洋股、洋债,后期也称外资、外债。晚清语境下的“外国资本”是一个救亡图存和与列强争利的政治范畴。在抵制外资、收回利权运动中,晚清各界主要从国人之外角度判定外国资本,其范畴

【相似文献】