1945-1946年宪政语境下中国共产党的政治妥协研究
发布时间:2018-02-24 20:04
本文关键词: 中国共产党 宪政 政治妥协 重庆谈判 政治协商会议 出处:《三峡大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:政治妥协是指在特定的社会共同体中,相互冲突的政治行为主体为了一定程度上的共同利益,为了避免直接对抗而两败俱伤,通过采取非对抗性的方式也即协商谈判,相互做出利益的让渡,以求得缓和矛盾甚至解决矛盾的利益调节机制或利益博弈机制。政治妥协的缺失是宪政在近代中国一直未能实现的重要原因之一。中国共产党在追求民主宪政的道路上曾做过许多政治让步或政治妥协,特别是在1945——1946年间的重庆谈判和政治协商会议上,中国共产党为了实现和平、民主和宪政的政治主张,曾对国民党做出巨大的政治妥协。虽然中共做出的这些政治妥协因为国民党发动内战而失效,未能达到实现和平、民主和宪政的目的,但是从中国革命总的进程上看,这些政治妥协仍然对中国共产党和中国革命的发展产生了许多积极效用。如果再把眼界扩展到当今建设中国特色社会主义伟大事业上来,我们可以发现,那些政治妥协是把政治化作艺术的智慧体现,是中国共产党的一笔难得的政治经验和宝贵的政治财富。
[Abstract]:Political compromise means that in a specific social community, conflicting political actors, in order to a certain extent of common interests, in order to avoid direct confrontation and the loss of both sides, through the adoption of non-confrontational means, that is, negotiation. The transfer of mutual benefits, The lack of political compromise is one of the important reasons why constitutionalism has not been realized in modern China. The Communist Party of China is pursuing democratic constitutionalism in the pursuit of democratic constitutionalism. There have been many political concessions or political compromises on the road, In particular, at the Chongqing negotiations and political Consultative Conference held between 1945 and 1946, the Communist Party of China held a political stand for peace, democracy and constitutionalism. Great political compromises were made to the KMT. Although these political compromises made by the Chinese Communists were invalidated by the KMT's civil war and failed to achieve the goals of peace, democracy and constitutionalism, from the perspective of the general process of the Chinese revolution, These political compromises still have many positive effects on the development of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese Revolution. If we further expand our vision to the great cause of building socialism with Chinese characteristics today, we can find that. Those political compromises are the wisdom of turning politics into art, a rare political experience and valuable political wealth of the Communist Party of China.
【学位授予单位】:三峡大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K265.19;D231
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 郭道晖;;宪政简论[J];法学杂志;1993年05期
2 裴莘;战后中间势力的崛起与分化[J];南开学报;2003年03期
3 林宇;;略论宪政妥协的要义[J];南方论刊;2007年08期
4 杨阳;;在东西方纵横视阈中析疑宪政概念[J];社会科学家;2008年03期
5 罗维;;政治妥协的马克思主义思想史考察[J];社会科学战线;2008年06期
6 罗许成;;政治妥协的哲学探析[J];浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
7 许崇德;社会主义宪政的不平凡历程——新中国第一部宪法颁布40周年纪念[J];中国法学;1994年05期
8 万斌;罗许成;;政治妥协的伦理辩护[J];浙江社会科学;2009年04期
9 万斌,罗维;论政治妥协[J];浙江学刊;2005年01期
,本文编号:1531532
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1531532.html