江津县退押运动再研究——与曹树基教授等讨论

发布时间：2018-03-03 08:37

本文选题：退押运动　切入点：法币贬值　出处：《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：押金是佃农交纳的地租保证金,退押运动是1950—1951年新区开展的地主退还押金的运动。曹树基教授以四川江津县档案为中心,是首位细致研究退押运动的学者。笔者深受其启发,但基本认识又与之相悖:从背景看,退押运动的发起与1940年后押租制下佃农的经济损害直接相关,跳过这一时段去争论1940年前押租制对佃农的利弊是走向了论证偏歧;从目的看,退押运动和支持人民币信用以及增加农业税收入几无关联,并非政府为充盈财政而设计的图谋,而是中共在前土改时期打击地主、启发农民“觉悟”的决策体现。
[Abstract]:The deposit is the rent deposit paid by the tenant farmers, and the remanding movement is the movement of returning the deposit by the landlords in the new area from 1950 to 1951. Professor Cao Shuji, centered on the archives of Jiangjin County, Sichuan Province, is the first scholar to study the remanding movement in detail. But the basic understanding is contrary to it: from the background, the initiation of the retreat movement is directly related to the economic damage of the tenant farmers under the system of remand rent after 1940, skipping this time to argue the advantages and disadvantages of the prepawn lease system on the tenant farmers before 1940 is going to be biased in argumentation; From the point of view of purpose, the retreat movement has little connection with supporting RMB credit and increasing the income of agricultural tax. It is not a plan designed by the government to replenish finance, but the decision of the Communist Party of China to crack down on landlords and inspire peasants'"consciousness" in the period of land reform before the land reform.
【作者单位】：清华大学历史系;
【分类号】：K27;F329

【相似文献】