从鸦片战争看文化维度差异

发布时间：2018-03-05 18:38

本文选题：文化维度　切入点：道光皇帝　出处：《青年记者》2014年28期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正《天朝的崩溃》从与传统观点不同的角度解读鸦片战争:比如指出传统史学道德批判的说服力欠缺;指出鸦片战争清政府不仅失败在武器装备、战略战术上,更失败在思想落后、体制落后上;不存在"如果没有‘投降派’,鸦片战争可能胜利"的可能性。通过该书提供的丰富史料、研究思路和研究结论,我的解读有: 1."不确定性规避"的差异。鸦片战争时期道光皇帝"守其常而不知其变",认为英国人和中国的少数民族并无不同,
[Abstract]:"the collapse of the Chinese Dynasty" interprets the Opium War from a different angle of view from the traditional perspective: for example, pointing out the lack of persuasiveness in the moral criticism of traditional historiography; and pointing out that the Qing government in the Opium War not only failed in weapons and equipment, but also in strategic and tactical terms. The failure lies in the backward ideology and backward system; there is no possibility that "if there were no capitulation, the Opium War would have been victorious." through the rich historical data, research ideas and conclusions provided by the book, My interpretation is as follows: 1. The difference of "uncertainty avoidance". During the Opium War, the Emperor of Daoguang "kept to himself but did not know how to change." he believed that there was no difference between the British and the ethnic minorities in China.
【分类号】：K253

【相似文献】