1932年中央大学教员索薪事件研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 18:51

本文选题：中央大学　切入点：教授　出处：《南京师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：20世纪20年代末30年代初,国内学校风潮不断。位于首都南京的中央大学也发生教员索薪事件。此次事件与中央大学经费的短缺不无关系。南京国民政府与江苏省政府的争端使得中央大学经费难以保障,而南京国民政府的财政困局又使其无法独立承担。中央大学经费困难导致教员的薪水无法正常发放,也使得教员难以继续过上知识贵族阶层的生活。然而,也不应忽视索薪事件的内在因素,比如20年代末到30年代初,中央大学学潮不断,在这样的土壤下很容易滋生教潮。另外,在索薪运动中,难免会看到教员攫取权力的影子。中央大学教员索薪事件由周佛海请求江苏省停止负担中央大学经费的提案而起,起初校方、教授和学生三者共同向南京和江苏省政府请愿,要求维护学校经费。随着事件的发展,教授开始向学校施压,要求其发放薪水。索薪的方式也由请愿转变为更为激烈的罢教。索薪事件愈演愈烈,教授和学生形成经费独立运动组织,不断请愿。但此时,学生逐渐成为这一组织的领导,索薪也变为干涉校务的学潮。中央大学遭到解散后,助教与教授一起,共同请愿索薪。由于教育界名流组成中央大学整理委员会的建议以及国内专科校长会议的请求,南京国民政府终于于7月份起开始十足发放薪水。由于物质基础、性格以及教育经历的不同,教员在索薪事件中变现出的态度也是截然不同的。有的教授冷眼旁观,有的则是积极参与。中央大学索薪事件是20年代末30年代初诸多学潮的重要一幕。此次事件,对于了解南京国民政府前期的教育困境和30年代知识分子的面貌有一定的学术价值。
[Abstract]:At the end of 1920s and early 30s, There is a constant tide of domestic schools. There is also an incident of teachers' pay at the Central University in Nanjing, the capital city. This incident has something to do with the shortage of funds for the central university. The dispute between the Nanjing National Government and the Jiangsu Provincial Government has made it difficult for the central university to secure its funds. The financial difficulties of the Nanjing National Government made it impossible for it to bear the burden of independence. The difficulties in funding the Central University made it impossible for teachers to pay their salaries normally and make it difficult for teachers to continue to live the life of the intellectual aristocrats. However, Nor should we lose sight of the intrinsic factors of wage cases, such as the constant tide of central university studies from the late 1920s to the early 1930s, which can easily breed a wave of teaching in such a soil. In addition, in the wage movement, Inevitably, we will see the shadow of teachers seizing power. The incident of the salary payment for teachers at the Central University started with Zhou Fohai's proposal to ask Jiangsu Province to stop paying the funds of the Central University. At first, the university authorities, professors and students jointly petitioned the Nanjing and Jiangsu provincial governments. With the development of the incident, professors began to put pressure on schools to pay their salaries. The method of paying salaries has also changed from petitions to more intense strikes for education. The pay-for-pay incident has intensified. Professors and students formed an independent campaign for funding and petitioned. But at this point, the students became the leaders of the organization, and the pay paid became a wave of interference in the affairs of the university. After the Central University was disbanded, the assistant professor joined the professor. Joint petition for salary. As a result of the recommendation of the Central University sorting Committee formed by celebrities in the educational circles and the request of the domestic college presidents' meeting, the Nanjing National Government finally began to pay full salaries in July. Because of the material basis, With different personalities and educational experiences, teachers' attitudes toward paychecks are also very different. Some professors look on with indifference. Some were actively involved. The pay issue at the Central University was an important part of many academic trends in the late 1920s and early 1930s. This time, It has certain academic value for understanding the educational predicament in the early period of Nanjing National Government and the outlook of intellectuals in 1930's.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：K263

【共引文献】