甲午战争前后日本窥伺窃取钓鱼岛述论

发布时间：2018-03-22 14:20

本文选题：甲午战争　切入点：中日关系　出处：《南京政治学院学报》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：1894年甲午战败,不仅标志着洋务运动的彻底失败,进而确认了鸦片战争之后清政府对"体—用"关系认知指导思想的破产,也对战后东亚乃至整个世界格局造成了深远的影响,这种影响甚至延续至今。今年是甲午战争爆发120周年,"往者不可谏,来者犹可追",史鉴的功能也正在于此。习主席在第十二届全国人大一次会议解放军代表团全体会议上指出:"能战方能止战,准备打才可能不必打,越不能打越可能挨打,这就是战争与和平的辩证法。"在甲午战争爆发120周年之际,认真反思甲午战争爆发及战败之原因,对理解这一战争与和平的辩证法意义尤殊。本栏约请相关领域的学者从不同角度就甲午战争及与之相关的问题发表见解,以期引起读者的关注与共鸣。
[Abstract]:The defeat in 1894 not only marked the complete failure of the Westernization Movement, but also confirmed the collapse of the Qing government's cognitive guiding ideology of "body-use" relations after the Opium War. It also had a profound impact on the post-war East Asia and even the entire world pattern. This influence even continues to this day. This year marks the 120th anniversary of the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War. This is the function of Shi Jian. Chairman Xi Xi pointed out at the plenary meeting of the PLA delegation of the first session of the Twelfth National people's Congress: "if you can fight, you can stop the war, and when you are ready to fight, you may not have to fight. The more you cannot fight, the more likely you will be beaten." This is the dialectic of war and peace. "on the 120th anniversary of the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, seriously reflect on the causes of the outbreak and defeat of the Sino-Japanese War. The dialectical significance of understanding this war and peace is especially special. This column invites scholars in related fields to express their opinions on the Sino-Japanese War of Japan and its related issues from different angles in order to attract readers' attention and resonance.
【作者单位】：南京大学历史系;
【分类号】：K256.3

【相似文献】