妥协与抗争:蒋介石与济南事件前后的对日决策

发布时间：2018-05-03 05:39

本文选题：济南事件 + 蒋介石　；参考：《抗日战争研究》2014年02期

【摘要】：本文利用台北"国史馆"藏《蒋中正总统文物档案》、日本亚洲历史资料中心收藏的相关日文档案,及《蒋中正总统档案·事略稿本》等书中所收蒋介石日记,对蒋介石在济南事件前后对日决策中的表现进行系统梳理。研究发现,蒋的对日妥协、退让既是事实,但另一方面,无论是在谈判桌,还是在战场上,他也都不乏强硬的一面。面对日方赤裸裸的武力威胁和过高的谈判要价,他虽有不少退让,但从未完全屈服。尤其当认清日方的侵略本质后,他便开始想尽办法,改换策略,与其对抗。为了逼迫日方在谈判条件上让步,他顶住压力,力排众议,一再拒斥日方军事交涉的要求,并试图利用日本军、政界内部的矛盾、分歧,力争实现事件的外交解决。这些看似消极的抵抗,却收到不错的效果——日方被迫在谈判条件上让步。此后,蒋愈发强硬,最终致使日方未能实现其预定目标,南京国民政府也因此得以避免遭受更大的损失。
[Abstract]:This paper makes use of the Jiang Jieshi diaries collected in the National History Museum in Taipei, in the collection of "President Chiang Chung-zheng 's Antiquities Archives", in the relevant Japanese language archives collected by the Asian Historical Information Center of Japan, and in the book "A brief manuscript on the Archives of President Jiang Zhongzheng", and so on. Jiang Jieshi in Jinan event before and after the performance of the Japanese decision-making a systematic combing. The study found that Chiang's compromise with Japan was a fact, but on the other hand, he had a hard side both at the negotiating table and on the battlefield. In the face of Japan's naked threat of force and excessive bargaining prices, he has made many concessions, but has never succumbed completely. Especially when he recognized the nature of Japanese aggression, he began to do everything he could to change tactics and confront it. In order to force the Japanese side to make concessions on the terms of the negotiations, he resisted pressure, rejected the demands of the Japanese side for military negotiations, and tried to make use of the contradictions and differences within the Japanese military and political circles in order to achieve a diplomatic solution to the incident. These seemingly negative resistance have had a good effect-Japan has been forced to compromise on negotiating terms. Since then, Chiang has become more assertive, and eventually failed to achieve its intended goal, and the Nanjing Nationalist government was able to avoid further losses.
【作者单位】：复旦大学历史学系;
【分类号】：K26

【参考文献】