袁世凯在朝鲜的活动与近代中朝日关系
发布时间:2018-05-08 00:14
本文选题:袁世凯 + 华夷秩序 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 近代中朝日三国关系,始终围绕着日本对中朝间宗藩关系的挑战而展开。因此,中日双方的对朝政策问题,事实上也成为彼此间的外交问题。一方要推行既定的大陆政策,一方要巩固帝国的东方防卫,当日本的扩张政策遭遇晚清帝国对自身安全和尊严最后的坚守时,双方不可避免的展开一系列角逐。朝鲜则无疑成为双方角力的舞台。从壬午兵变清政府出兵朝鲜开始,到甲午战争之后被迫彻底放弃朝鲜为止,中日双方围绕朝鲜问题展开了一系列复杂的外交较量。 中日两国在朝鲜的角逐,历时十有二年。期间既有壬午、甲申年间的剑拔弩张,也有《天津条约》后的相对缓和。亲历其事的袁世凯,不仅是清政府对朝对日政策的实施者,在一定程度上也是对朝对日政策的参与制定者,其在朝鲜的活动紧紧围绕加强中朝宗藩关系、抵制日本势力对朝鲜的控制两项目的而展开。壬午兵变以后,面对中国在朝鲜优势军事力量的存在,日本对朝政策转入消极。中法战争爆发后,日本迅速调整了对朝政策,尝试着对中朝宗藩关系的进一步破坏。然而驻朝清军的迅速出动,粉碎了日本的阴谋。 甲申事变以后,东亚的国际形势发生了巨大的变化。英俄两国在朝鲜对抗的加剧,引发了日本对自身安全和长远利益的担忧。鉴于自身军事准备的不足,日本积极怂恿中国加强对朝鲜的控制。面对有利的国际形势,中国迅速调整了对朝政策。以大院君的释回和袁世凯驻朝为契机,中国的对朝政策更趋积极。然而,朝鲜逐渐增强的自主意识,却使得袁世凯巩固中朝宗藩关系的努力带来事与愿违的效果。尽管在袁世凯驻朝期间,朝鲜并没有脱离中国,但是日益增强的离心倾向事实上宣告了控制政策的失败。 为了彻底解除中朝之间的宗藩关系,日本暂时放弃与清政府在朝鲜政治上的争夺,专注于经济和军事力量的积累,甚至不惜为此谋求与清政府的“合作”。当所有的准备工作完成以后,立即以战争的方式消除了中朝之间的宗藩关系。
[Abstract]:The relations between China, Korea and Japan in modern times have always revolved around Japan's challenge to the Suzerain-vassal relationship between China and Korea. Therefore, the issue of policy towards North Korea between China and Japan has in fact become a diplomatic issue for each other. One side wants to carry out the established mainland policy, the other side wants to strengthen the eastern defense of the empire, when Japan's expansionist policy meets the last adherence to its own security and dignity in the late Qing Dynasty, the two sides inevitably launch a series of competitions. North Korea, no doubt, has become a stage for the two sides to wrestle with each other. From the time when the Qing government sent troops to Korea, and until they were forced to abandon Korea completely after the Sino-Japanese War, China and Japan launched a series of complicated diplomatic contests over the Korean issue. The rivalry between China and Japan in North Korea lasted for ten to two years. During both non-Wu, Jia Shen years of tension, but also after the Treaty of Tianjin relative relaxation. Yuan Shikai, who has personally seen the issue, is not only the executor of the Qing government's policy towards Japan, but also the participating maker of the policy towards Japan to some extent. Its activities in North Korea are closely related to strengthening the relations between China and North Korea's suzerain-vassal state. A boycott of the two programs of Japanese control over North Korea. After the mutiny, Japan's policy toward North Korea turned negative in the face of China's superior military power in North Korea. After the outbreak of the Sino-French War, Japan quickly adjusted its policy towards North Korea and tried to further destroy the Suzerain-vassal relationship between China and North Korea. However, the rapid movement of the Qing troops in Korea shattered the Japanese plot. Great changes have taken place in the international situation in East Asia since the Jiashen incident. The intensifying confrontation between Britain and Russia in North Korea has raised concerns about Japan's security and long-term interests. In view of its inadequate military preparations, Japan has actively encouraged China to tighten its grip on North Korea. In the face of the favorable international situation, China quickly adjusted its policy towards the DPRK. China's policy toward North Korea has become more positive, taking the interpretation of the grand master and Yuan Shikai's presence in North Korea as an opportunity. However, North Korea's growing sense of autonomy has made Yuan Shikai's efforts to consolidate the Suzerain-vassal relationship backfired. Although North Korea did not leave China during Yuan Shikai's stay in North Korea, the growing centrifugal trend effectively declared a failure of control policy. In order to completely dissolve the suzerain-vassal relationship between China and North Korea, Japan temporarily abandoned the political struggle with the Qing government in Korea, focused on the accumulation of economic and military power, and even sought "cooperation" with the Qing government for this purpose. When all preparations were completed, the Suzerain-vassal relationship between China and North Korea was immediately eliminated by war.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K256
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张礼恒;;评甲午战争前清政府的对朝政策[J];安徽史学;1993年02期
2 权赫秀;韩国藏张树声、丁汝昌、吴兆有致朝鲜王朝官员书信三件笺证[J];安徽史学;2003年05期
3 纪能文;关于袁世凯在朝鲜活动的历史考察[J];安阳师范学院学报;2001年01期
4 戚骥;;试论清政府对朝鲜政策(1885——1894年)变化形成之背景[J];白城师范学院学报;2006年02期
5 何芳川;“华夷秩序”论[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年06期
6 周颂伦;甲午战争前夕日本社会的精神状态[J];吉林师范学院学报;1995年07期
7 权赫秀;;有关袁世凯史料三件考证[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
8 高强;甲午战前清韩宗藩关系的强化及其后果[J];宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版);2001年02期
9 高强;试论甲午战争前夜中、日、朝三国关系[J];宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
10 吴蓓;十九世纪亚洲的宗藩体系与殖民体系[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杨机像;袁世凯与中朝宗藩关系[D];吉林大学;2004年
2 宋娜娜;朝鲜“壬午兵变”与清对朝政策研究[D];延边大学;2006年
,本文编号:1859088
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1859088.html