北洋时期基层社会的缠讼:李希明与荣坤等地亩互控案

发布时间：2018-05-23 22:17

本文选题：北洋时期 + 基层社会　；参考：《史学月刊》2014年11期

【摘要】：北洋时期,中国近代司法改革逐渐在基层社会推行。发生在北京附近三河县与顺义县的李希明与荣坤等地亩互控案展示了基层社会缠讼的变与不变,反映了法律变迁的复杂性。该案显示了缠讼的一些特征,如诉讼时间长,涉案人员多,原被告纠缠在一起,诉讼文书多,提审次数多,各方受尽讼累。缠讼往往源于冤屈未申,涉讼者随世事变化而重启讼端,旧案受理规则与诉讼时效制度不能很好地遏制缠讼案件的受理,民间调处不能有效疏导冤屈,以及执行难问题的存在都会让缠讼不断发展。北洋时期,尚无一套有效机制来阻止一些与案件并无密切关系的个人、群体,乃至行政机关对审判进程发生影响,上级司法机关也对缠讼施加压力,涉讼者和审判官则穿梭于各种力量之间。
[Abstract]:During the period of Beiyang, China's modern judicial reform was gradually carried out in the grassroots society. The cases of Li Ximing and Rongkun in Sanhe County and Shunyi County near Beijing show the change and invariance of social litigation and reflect the complexity of legal changes. The case shows some characteristics of litigation, such as long litigation time, more personnel involved, the original defendant entangled together, more litigation documents, more times of arraignment, all parties tired of litigation. Litigation often originates from grievances, and the litigants restart with the changes of the world. The rules of accepting old cases and the system of limitation of action can not well contain the acceptance of cases, and folk mediation cannot effectively relieve grievances. And the existence of difficult enforcement problems will allow litigation to continue to develop. During the period of the Northern Ocean, there was no effective mechanism to prevent some individuals, groups, and even administrative organs that had no close relationship with the case from influencing the trial process, and the higher judicial organs also exerted pressure on the litigation. The litigant and the judge were shuttling between forces.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：K258.2

【参考文献】