清末民初思想话语中的“民权”与“国权”

发布时间:2018-05-25 08:03

  本文选题:民权 + 国权 ; 参考:《社会科学辑刊》2017年06期


【摘要】:"民权""国权"是清末民初思想文献中反复出现的概念,但人们使用这一对概念时,其所指却比较复杂。清末民初思想人士对于"民权"的使用,或指参政权,或指参政权与自由权,或指人民的权力、权利能力。民国初年,思想界所称"民权",其所指一般包括自由权与参政权两个方面,但其重心在参政权。国民党大张"民权"的旗帜,立宪党人乃大张"国权"的旗帜以与之抗衡。一般情况下,民国初年的立宪党人所使用的"民权"一词,可能指国民之参政权,也可能指国民之自由权,有时也可能两者都包括。清末民初人们对"国权"一词的使用,比较复杂,在不同的语境中,其所指有所不同,需要加以细致的区分,或指国家权力,或指主权,或指主权之某一方面如统治权、独立权,或又指政府权。
[Abstract]:The concept of "civil rights" and "national power" is a concept that appears repeatedly in the ideological literature of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, but when people use this pair of concepts, their reference is quite complex. The use of civil rights by ideological personages in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China refers to the right to participate in political power and freedom, or to the power and ability of the people. In the early years of the Republic of China, the ideological circle referred to "civil rights", which generally included two aspects: freedom and political participation, but its focus was on political participation. The Nationalist Party held the banner of civil rights, and the constitutionalists opposed it to the banner of national power. In general, the term "civil rights" used by constitutionalists in the early years of the Republic of China may refer to the right of citizens to participate in political power, to their right to freedom, and sometimes to both. In the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China, the use of the term "national power" was quite complicated. In different contexts, the meaning of "national power" was different and needed to be carefully distinguished, either referring to state power or to one aspect of sovereignty, such as sovereignty. Independence, or the power of government.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】:K252

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 周理;;国权与民权的调和:晚清的梁启超(1894—1911)[J];西安文理学院学报(社会科学版);2013年04期

2 韩英军;中国近代民权的演化及其逻辑[J];天府新论;2005年01期

3 吴乃华;;五四时期陈独秀与鲁迅对人权与国权相互关系的认识[J];民主;2010年09期

4 周石峰;;国权与商利:抗战时期贵阳商会初探[J];浙江万里学院学报;2007年06期

5 张海清;;君权、国权与民权之间的变奏:以康梁为中心的考察[J];贵州社会科学;2010年05期

6 陈廷湘;1920年前后两次争国权运动的异样形态及形成原因[J];近代史研究;2005年02期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 刘刚 冬君;卖国权与保王权[N];中国经营报;2012年



本文编号:1932704

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1932704.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0d5d9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com