“广田三原则”评析

发布时间：2018-05-31 16:20

本文选题：“广田三原则” + 大陆政策　；参考：《东北师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：“广田三原则”在日本侵华史上占有重要地位,是明治以来日本历届政府对华政策的延续。本文运用文献资料分析的方法,在前人研究的基础上,解析“广田三原则”。内容涉及“三原则”提出的过程、中日双方的交涉以及“三原则”的实质等问题。此外,本文还将对中国共产党对“三原则”的反应作出独到的梳理和分析。本论文共三部分来评析“广田三原则”。第一部分主要通过对日本明治年间的大陆政策、1934年发表的“天羽声明”及作为口号的“和协外交”之间的延续性的分析,指出“三原则”的提出并非偶然。它是日本政客顺应日本国内各界对华诉求的结果。无论20世纪30年代日本对中国提出何种“友善”的口号,其实质和最终目的都是一致的。第二部分对中国国民政府当局与日本围绕“广田三原则”展开的交涉进行论述,同时,分析了中国共产党对“三原则”的反应。国民政府的对日交涉大致经历了三个阶段,交涉的问题分别是:“王崇惠三原则”与“广田三原则”的关系(主要在中国驻日大使蒋作宾与日本外相广田弘毅之间进行)、所谓的华北“自治运动”与“广田三原则”的关系、国民政府压制反日情绪与“广田三原则”的关系(主要在国民政府外交部长张群与日本驻华大使川越茂之间进行)。国民政府在对日交涉的过程中态度出现了变化,由最初的妥协退让到逐渐强硬、准备抗日。同时,在这一部分中也增加了前人在研究“广田三原则”过程中没有提及的中共的反应,分析了中共的处境决定了对“三原则”反应的局限性。第三部分分析了“广田三原则”的具体内容,梳理了中日双方在“三原则”交涉过程中的态度和立场,指出:“三原则”是日本独霸中国的构想的外在表现。最后,本论文得出结论:“广田三原则”是明治以来日本历届政府对华政策的延续、是日本侵占东北后对华政策的新调整,内容有一定的欺骗性,形式的转换掩盖不了实质。
[Abstract]:The "three principles of Hiroshima" occupies an important position in the history of Japanese aggression against China and is a continuation of the Japanese government's policy towards China since Meiji. On the basis of previous studies, this paper analyzes the three principles of Guangda by using the method of literature analysis. The content involves the process of putting forward the three principles, the negotiation between China and Japan, and the essence of the three principles. In addition, this paper will analyze the Communist Party of China's response to the three principles. This thesis consists of three parts to comment on the three principles of Guangda. The first part points out that the "three principles" are not accidental through the analysis of the policy of the Meiji period in Japan, the "Tianyu Declaration" issued in 1934, and the continuity of "Harmony diplomacy" as a slogan. It is the result of Japanese politicians' compliance with Japan's domestic demands for China. No matter what kind of "friendly" slogan Japan put forward to China in the 1930s, its essence and ultimate aim were the same. The second part discusses the negotiation between the Chinese National Government and Japan around the "three principles of Guangda", and analyzes the reaction of the Communist Party of China to the "three principles". The National Government's representations to Japan have generally gone through three stages. The issues of negotiation are: the relationship between the "three principles of Wang Chonghui" and the "three principles of Hiroda" (mainly between Chinese Ambassador to Japan Jiang Zuobin and Japanese Foreign Minister Hiroshi Hiroshi), the so-called "autonomous movement" in North China and "Hiroda" The relationship between the three principles, The relationship between the suppression of anti-Japanese sentiment by the national government and the "three principles of Hiroda" (mainly between Zhang Qun, the foreign minister of the National Government, and Kawamoto, the Japanese ambassador to China). In the process of negotiation with Japan, the national government changed its attitude, from the initial compromise to the gradual hardline, ready to resist Japan. At the same time, in this part, the reaction of the Chinese Communist Party which was not mentioned in the study of the "three principles of Guangda" is added, and the limitation of the response to the "three principles" is determined by the situation of the Communist Party of China. The third part analyzes the concrete contents of "three principles of Hiroda", combs the attitude and position of China and Japan in the negotiation process of "three principles", and points out that "three principles" is the external manifestation of Japan's idea of dominating China. Finally, this paper draws a conclusion that the "three principles of Hiroshima" is a continuation of the successive Japanese governments' China policy since Meiji, and a new adjustment of Japan's policy towards China after Japan's occupation of Northeast China. The contents are deceptive, and the change of form cannot cover up the essence.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：K265

【参考文献】