民族主义的可贵与可爱——现代中国国家认同塑造的两种进路

发布时间：2018-06-06 07:34

本文选题：辛亥革命 + 国家权威　；参考：《学术月刊》2015年04期

【摘要】：许纪霖认为,民初政治混乱的原因在于国家权威缺位,各方政治势力争夺的仅是权力,而一再错失重建国家权威的机会。沈洁认为,民初的多头权威,北洋与民党、北洋内部、民党内部的多重缠斗,致使政治走向无序和无休止的争端。宋宏认为,民国初年的君主立宪论即旨在回应国家权威缺位的问题,有相当的民意基础,然而面临着许多难以克服的现实困难,终归于失败。严泉梳理了民初要求地方分权的省宪主张,认为1923年民国宪法已经创设了一种体现中国特色的联邦分权制度,然而这种制度建构尝试很快被国民革命打断。瞿骏认为,现代中国国家认同塑造过程中,多看重民族主义之"可贵",并以各种各样的方式来全力使民众知晓民族主义之"可贵",却较少去普及民族主义之"可爱"。
[Abstract]:Xu Jilin believed that the reason for the political chaos in the early days of the Republic of China was the absence of state authority, and the political forces of all sides scrambled for only power, and repeatedly missed the opportunity to re-establish state authority. Shen Jie believes that the multitudinous authority in the early days of the Republic of China, the numerous battles between the Beiyang and the Democratic Party, the inside of the Northern Ocean, and the interior of the Democratic Party have led to disorderly and endless disputes in politics. Song Hong believed that the constitutional monarchy in the early years of the Republic of China was designed to respond to the absence of state authority and had a considerable basis of public opinion, but faced with many insurmountable practical difficulties, it ended in failure. Yan Quan combed the province-constitutionalism that called for decentralization in the beginning of the Republic of China, and thought that the constitution of the Republic of China in 1923 had created a federal decentralization system with Chinese characteristics. However, the attempt to construct the system was interrupted by the national revolution. Qu Jun believes that in the process of shaping the national identity of modern China, more attention is paid to the "precious" of nationalism, and all kinds of ways are used to make the people know the "precious" of nationalism, but less to popularize the "lovable" of nationalism.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“清末民初现代国家观念的普及化研究(1895-1919)”(11CZS057) 上海市浦江人才计划项目(11PJC043)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K257

【参考文献】