社会主义论战缘起再审视——地域、认同与形象构建的视角

发布时间：2018-06-26 05:27

  本文选题：社会主义论战 + 内地　； 参考：《齐鲁学刊》2015年06期

【摘要】：张东荪一篇不到600字的时评何以会引发社会主义论战?之前的内地演讲所提示的地域与认同因素在论战中扮演着怎样的角色?进而言之,该论战的思想论争层面与社会、心态与认同层面的关系如何?通过对论战参与者社会位置、认同与言说的分析,上述问题当可得一合理解答。论战中思想论争的关键在于外来主义与中国国情的关系问题.张东荪以湖南与罗素为背景的评论,触发了离乡新知识分子内地认同与"世界民"心态和形象之间的矛盾,导致其发言以争夺代表内地的资格,并激辩中国在世界中位置与作用为主题。这一争论在一战后西方日益分裂的大背景下,提示着思想权势从美国向新俄的转移。既存研究所强调的论战中马克思主义者对非马克思主义者的胜利,更多体现在心态与认同层面,而非思想层面。
[Abstract]:Why does Zhang Dongsun's commentary in less than 600 words lead to a debate on socialism? What role does the region and identity factor play in the debate? Furthermore, what is the relationship between the debate level and the society, the mentality and the identity level? By analyzing the social position, identity and speech of the participants in the debate, the above questions can be reasonably answered. The key to ideological debate in the debate lies in the relationship between extranationism and China's national conditions. Zhang Dongsun's comments with Hunan and Russell as the background triggered a contradiction between the mainland identity of the new intellectuals who left home and the mentality and image of the "world people," leading him to speak in order to compete for qualifications to represent the mainland. And debate China's position and role in the world as the theme. This argument, in the context of the growing division of the West after World War I, suggests the shift of ideological power from the United States to the new Russia. The victory of Marxists over non-Marxists in the debate emphasized by the existential Research Institute is more embodied in the level of mentality and identity than in the level of thought.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“晚清士人天下观研究”(15XNB036)
【分类号】：K26
，

本文编号：2069316