陈澧之学的两歧反应及不同立意

发布时间：2018-09-10 15:51

【摘要】：学人对于陈澧学说的认识在其身前、身后迥异其趣,而又前后呼应。在陈澧身前,学人最重其经史考证之作,而根本不提其有意超越江浙学术而精心结撰的汉宋兼采之学。经张之洞鼓吹,陈澧汉宋兼采之学在其身后成为显学,引起一些学有本末的大儒名家辨析其中精微,不仅显现同为所谓"兼采汉宋之学"的取径差异,更可见其中落脚根基的深浅。这些对陈澧兼采汉宋之学持批评态度的学人,对陈澧经解小学与地理考证之作皆极倾倒,不仅与当时学人在陈澧身前的认识接近,甚至与陈澧最终的自我评断一致,可见学术本身自有约束的机制,不受外在风气与权势的转移。
[Abstract]:The scholar's understanding of Chen Li's theory in front of him, behind his different interests, and echo. Before Chen Li, the scholar attached the most importance to his works of historical research, but did not mention that he intended to transcend the academic studies of Jiangsu and Zhejiang in the Han and Song dynasties. According to Zhang Zhidong's preaching, the Han and Song dynasties and the School of Learning in the Han and Song dynasties became prominent behind Zhang Zhidong, which led to the differentiation and analysis of some of the great Confucianism and famous scholars of the past, and not only showed the difference of the paths of the so-called "the study of the Han and Song dynasties", but also of the so-called "the study of the Han and Song dynasties". We can see the depth of the foundation. These scholars, who have criticized Chen Li and the study of Han and Song dynasties, have been extremely attracted to the works of the Chen Li Jing Jie Primary School and the geographical textual research, which are not only close to the scholars' understanding in front of Chen Li at that time, but even consistent with the final self-evaluation of Chen Li. It can be seen that the academic itself has its own restraint mechanism and is not subject to the transfer of external atmosphere and power.
【作者单位】：中山大学历史系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“学海堂与近代汉宋关系”(13YJC770062) 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“学海堂与汉宋学之浙粤递嬗”(13FZS008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K252

【参考文献】