日本对七七事变的认识及中日论争

发布时间：2018-10-12 11:44

【摘要】：1937年7月7日,七七事变爆发。当时的日本媒体、民众几乎一边倒地叫嚣"膺惩暴支",日本政府宣称七七事变是中方有计划的"武装抗日",决定附和军部"扩大派",伺机扩大侵华战争。然而,战后东京审判以大量史料证实七七事变是日本陆军计划、煽动和阴谋制造的产物,还原了事变真相,对日本人对七七事变的认识产生了一定影响。日本保守学者虽从推卸侵华战争"责任"出发,认为七七事变具有偶然性,是第29军士兵开了事变"第一枪",但也不认同右翼分子提出的所谓中国共产党"阴谋"说、国民党责任说、共产国际和苏联责任说等奇谈怪论。日本进步学者虽与中国学者的七七事变认识也不一致,但以承认日本侵华战争性质和战争责任为前提,这是开展中日学术交流和共同研究的基础,从而为缩小中日历史认识差距和扩大共识创造了条件。
[Abstract]:The July 7 th incident broke out on July 7, 1937. In the Japanese media at that time, the public almost unilaterally shouted "forgery to punish the violent branch." the Japanese government declared that the July 7th incident was a planned "armed resistance" by the Chinese side, and decided to join the "expanded faction" of the military headquarters and wait for the opportunity to expand the war of aggression against China. However, the Tokyo trial after the war confirmed with a great deal of historical data that the July 7th incident was the product of the Japanese Army's plan, incitement and conspiracy, which restored the truth of the incident and had a certain impact on the Japanese people's understanding of the July 7th incident. Although Japanese conservative scholars, starting from shirking the "responsibility" of the war of aggression against China, believe that the July 7th incident was accidental and that the soldiers of the 29th Army fired the "first shot" in the incident, they do not agree with the so-called "conspiracy" of the Chinese Communist Party put forward by the right-wing elements. The KMT's theory of responsibility, the Communist International and the Soviet Union's theory of responsibility, etc. Although Japanese progressive scholars do not agree with Chinese scholars on the July 7th incident, the premise is to recognize the nature and responsibility of Japan's war of aggression against China, which is the basis for carrying out academic exchanges and joint research between China and Japan. Thus, it creates conditions for narrowing the gap of historical understanding between China and Japan and expanding the consensus.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【基金】：2016年国家社会科学基金抗日战争研究专项工程项目“中国抗日战争志”(16KZD021)
【分类号】：K265.4;K313.46

【相似文献】