清代经解文献系年考—咸同光宣时期
发布时间：2018-11-16 12:32
【摘要】：中国传统学术发展到清代,进入整理和总结的重要时期。而作为官方哲学的经学也在此时发展到鼎盛,影响着清代以至近代社会的政治、教育、文化等各个方面。据粗略统计,有清一代,经学研究学者超过一千人,经学相关著作达万余种之多,可谓卷帙浩繁、汗牛充栋。但在学术界,目前还缺少编年体的清代经学研究著作,尤其是系统的清代经学著作成书年代的考证还是一个空白。 本文以考证清代经学著作的成书年代为重点,立足于文献学的基本研究方法,于浩如烟海的清代史籍和今人著述中,梳理出清代经解文献成书年代的相关信息,按年系书事,依书编排,每一条目先系年月,次述成书情况,次引立论依据及文献出处,最后介绍作者并作相关说明和考证。 本系列论文《清代经解文献系年考》主要考证成书于有清一代(公元1644-1911年)的经学著作。依清帝年号分为四个阶段、四个部分：顺治康熙时期(1644-1722年),雍正乾隆时期(1723-1795年),嘉庆道光时期(1796-1850年),咸丰同治光绪宣统时期(1851-1911年)。本文是此系列论文的第四阶段：咸丰同治光绪宣统时期(1851-1911年),分为绪论、凡例、正文和余论四部分。第一部分综述此阶段经学研究的现状和研究的方法。第二部分简述系年所依据的原则及标准：以年代为经,以著作为纬。第三部分从清代史籍和近人在此方面的著述中,梳理出有关咸同光宣时期经解文献成书年代的相关信息,然后将之系在不同的年份下。第四部分在系年的基础上对此阶段经学发展概况和特点作出简单概括,归结出此阶段经学在继乾嘉昌盛局面之后表现出新的特点,同时也取得了令人瞩目的成就。 总之,本文秉承文献学“辨章学术、考镜源流”的学术宗旨,对清代咸同光宣时期经解文献的成书年代第一次进行了深入而系统的考证,并按照成书年代进行了排序；其次,传统的学术史往往以最重要人物、著作、思想及学派为研究对象,缺乏对次要人物与著作的关注,本文第一次对此时期的经学家及其著作进行了清理和考证,基本勾勒出清代经解文献的发展全貌。这也是本文的特色和创新之处。
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional academic development to the Qing Dynasty, into an important period of collation and summary. As an official philosophy, the Confucian classics also developed to the peak at this time, which influenced the politics, education, culture and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty and modern society. According to rough statistics, there were more than 1,000 scholars in the Qing Dynasty, and more than ten thousand related works of Confucian classics, which could be described as voluminous and abundant. However, in academic circles, there is still a lack of chronological studies of the Qing Dynasty, especially the systematic textual research of the Qing Dynasty. Based on the basic research methods of philology, and in the vast historical books of the Qing Dynasty and in the writings of present people, this paper, focusing on the textual research on the age of the books of the classics of the Qing Dynasty, sorts out the relevant information of the time when the documents of the classics of the Qing Dynasty were written, and then it is a matter of the book according to the year. According to the book arrangement, each entry is the first year and month, then describes the situation of the book, the basis of the secondary citation theory and the source of the literature, and finally introduces the author and makes relevant explanations and textual research. In this series of papers, the Department of Classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty, the main textual research in the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911) of the classics works. According to the title of Emperor Qing Dynasty, it is divided into four parts: Shunzhi Kangxi period (1644-1722), Yongzheng Qianlong period (1723-1795), Jiaqing Daoguang period (1796-1850), Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuanzhong period (1851-1911). This paper is the fourth stage of this series of papers: Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuantong period (1851-1911), divided into four parts: introduction, examples, the text and the rest. The first part summarizes the current situation and research methods of the study of Confucian classics in this stage. The second part briefly describes the principles and criteria on which the year is based: the year as the meridian and the book as the latitude. In the third part, from the historical books of Qing Dynasty and the works of modern people in this respect, the author sorts out the relevant information about the literature of Xiantong Guangxuan period, and then puts it in different years. The fourth part makes a brief summary of the development and characteristics of Confucian classics in this stage on the basis of the years, and concludes that the Confucian classics in this stage showed new characteristics after the prosperity of Qianjia and made remarkable achievements at the same time. In a word, this paper, in keeping with the academic purpose of philology, "the study of chapter differentiation, examination of the source of mirror", makes a deep and systematic textual research on the first time of the writing of the classics in the period of salt and light propaganda in the Qing Dynasty, and makes a ranking according to the time of the completion of the book. Secondly, the traditional academic history often takes the most important person, the work, the thought and the school as the research object, lacks to pay attention to the secondary figure and the work, this article has carried on the clean up and the textual research to this period economist and its work for the first time, Basic outline of the Qing Dynasty, the development of the literature. This is also the characteristics and innovation of this article.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B234;K252
本文编号：2335528
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional academic development to the Qing Dynasty, into an important period of collation and summary. As an official philosophy, the Confucian classics also developed to the peak at this time, which influenced the politics, education, culture and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty and modern society. According to rough statistics, there were more than 1,000 scholars in the Qing Dynasty, and more than ten thousand related works of Confucian classics, which could be described as voluminous and abundant. However, in academic circles, there is still a lack of chronological studies of the Qing Dynasty, especially the systematic textual research of the Qing Dynasty. Based on the basic research methods of philology, and in the vast historical books of the Qing Dynasty and in the writings of present people, this paper, focusing on the textual research on the age of the books of the classics of the Qing Dynasty, sorts out the relevant information of the time when the documents of the classics of the Qing Dynasty were written, and then it is a matter of the book according to the year. According to the book arrangement, each entry is the first year and month, then describes the situation of the book, the basis of the secondary citation theory and the source of the literature, and finally introduces the author and makes relevant explanations and textual research. In this series of papers, the Department of Classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty, the main textual research in the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911) of the classics works. According to the title of Emperor Qing Dynasty, it is divided into four parts: Shunzhi Kangxi period (1644-1722), Yongzheng Qianlong period (1723-1795), Jiaqing Daoguang period (1796-1850), Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuanzhong period (1851-1911). This paper is the fourth stage of this series of papers: Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuantong period (1851-1911), divided into four parts: introduction, examples, the text and the rest. The first part summarizes the current situation and research methods of the study of Confucian classics in this stage. The second part briefly describes the principles and criteria on which the year is based: the year as the meridian and the book as the latitude. In the third part, from the historical books of Qing Dynasty and the works of modern people in this respect, the author sorts out the relevant information about the literature of Xiantong Guangxuan period, and then puts it in different years. The fourth part makes a brief summary of the development and characteristics of Confucian classics in this stage on the basis of the years, and concludes that the Confucian classics in this stage showed new characteristics after the prosperity of Qianjia and made remarkable achievements at the same time. In a word, this paper, in keeping with the academic purpose of philology, "the study of chapter differentiation, examination of the source of mirror", makes a deep and systematic textual research on the first time of the writing of the classics in the period of salt and light propaganda in the Qing Dynasty, and makes a ranking according to the time of the completion of the book. Secondly, the traditional academic history often takes the most important person, the work, the thought and the school as the research object, lacks to pay attention to the secondary figure and the work, this article has carried on the clean up and the textual research to this period economist and its work for the first time, Basic outline of the Qing Dynasty, the development of the literature. This is also the characteristics and innovation of this article.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B234;K252
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄开国;廖平经学六变时间略考[J];成都大学学报(社会科学版);1987年01期
2 姜钧;梁启超与孔学[J];孔子研究;1986年02期
3 赵振铎;;从《周礼正义》看孙诒让对《集韵》的研究[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期
4 朱淑君;戴望经学述论[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年S3期
5 鲁锦寰;;科学与人文融会的传统——读杨小明《清代浙东学派与科学》[J];史学月刊;2006年02期
6 杨洪升;;缪荃孙著述新考[J];图书馆杂志;2008年05期
7 刘墨;;王国维的经学研究[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年05期
8 梅新林;俞樟华;;浙东学派编年史的学术创意与构想[J];浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
9 陈国庆,曾谦;章炳麟传统学术研究的成就[J];中州学刊;2003年02期
10 任剑涛;经典解读中的原创思想负载——从《孟子字义疏证》与《孟子微》看[J];中国哲学史;2002年01期
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 史振卿;清代《尚书》学若干问题研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
2 朱华忠;清代《论语》简论[D];华中师范大学;2002年
3 赵庆伟;清代孟学研究[D];华中师范大学;2002年
4 柳宏;清代《论语》诠释史论[D];扬州大学;2004年
5 何海燕;清代《诗经》学研究[D];华中师范大学;2005年
6 文廷海;清代春秋谷梁学研究[D];华中师范大学;2005年
7 王应宪;清代吴派学术研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
8 房瑞丽;清代三家《诗》研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
9 刘宗棠;清代《左传》文献研究[D];山东大学;2008年
10 彭喜双;《尔雅》文献研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 马瑜;俞樾《诗经》研究的成就及影响[D];山西大学;2006年
2 赵景雪;清代《孝经》文献研究[D];山东大学;2007年
3 吴保森;郭嵩焘三《质疑》研究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
，本文编号：2335528
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2335528.html
