清季新世纪派无政府主义思想研究
发布时间：2019-01-05 17:57
【摘要】：新世纪派是清季宣传无政府主义思想的重要派别,因创办《新世纪》周刊而得名,它与同时期的天义派并列为中国早期无政府主义思想的两大派别。文章主要以1907年张静江、吴稚晖、李石曾、褚民谊等人在法国巴黎创办的《新世纪》周刊为研究素材,试图通过《新世纪》周刊探究新世纪派无政府主义思想的真实面目,进而揭示清季革命思潮中激进的一面。在清季的革命浪潮中,革命阵营中的不同派别出于不同的思想理念就中国的革命问题产生了分歧。留学欧洲的张静江、吴稚晖、李石曾、褚民谊等人由于受西方无政府主义思潮的影响,逐渐地走上无政府主义革命的道路。在《新世纪》周刊上,他们系统地阐释了无政府主义思想,认为无政府主义不仅可能,同时也是历史发展的必然。出于理念的不同,新世纪派同立宪派与革命派展开论争,一方面,他们猛烈地批判康梁领导的立宪活动,另一方面,他们断言同盟会所领导的革命非真正意义上的革命,真正的革命应该是为实现社会多数幸福的无政府主义社会革命。文章正文共三章。第一章集中论述新世纪派无政府主义思想的确立,自1902年张静江、李石曾赴法后,褚民谊、吴稚晖等人相继西行,在法国他们接受了西方的无政府主义思想,进而创办《新世纪》周刊以宣扬之,形成了以宣扬无政府主义思想的新世纪派。但就思想渊源而言,他们更多的承接巴苦宁和克鲁泡特金的无政府主义思想。第二章则着重考察新世纪派无政府主义思想的主要内容,新世纪派以推翻强权为职志,倡导通过无政府主义社会革命推翻政治强权、经济强权和社会强权。第三章为新世纪派无政府主义思想同清季思想论争。他们对于当时如火如荼的立宪活动以及革命活动都作出了回应,他们不仅猛烈地批判了清朝和清季立宪活动,而且对革命派的种族革命理念也进行了抨击,不同的是即使他们同革命派存在诸多分歧,在实际上他们仍给予革命派以诸多支持,为维护革命团体的团结作出了贡献。
[Abstract]:The New Century School is an important faction in the Qing Dynasty to propagate anarchism thought. It is named for the establishment of the New Century Weekly. It is parallel with the Tianyi School of the same period as the two major schools of anarchist thought in the early period of China. The article mainly takes the weekly "New Century", which was founded by Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi in Paris in 1907, as the research material, and attempts to explore the true face of the anarchism thought of the new century school through the "New Century" Weekly. And then reveal the radical side of the revolutionary trend of thought in Qing Dynasty. In the revolutionary wave of Qing Dynasty, different factions in the revolutionary camp had different ideas about China's revolution. Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi, who studied in Europe, gradually embarked on the road of anarchist revolution because of the influence of western anarchism. In New Century Weekly they systematically explained anarchism thought that anarchism is not only possible but also a necessity of historical development. Because of the difference of ideas, the new century school argued with the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries. On the one hand, they vehemently criticized Kang Liang's constitutionalism activities; on the other hand, they asserted that the revolution led by the Alliance was not a revolution in the true sense. The real revolution should be an anarchist social revolution for most of society's happiness. The text of the article consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the establishment of anarchism in the new century. After Zhang Jingjiang and Li Shi went to France in 1902, Chu Minyi, Wu Zhihui and others went westward one after another, and in France they accepted the western anarchist thought. Then the New Century Weekly was founded to promote it and formed the New Century School to promote anarchism. But as far as their ideological origin is concerned, they carry on the anarchism of Barkunin and Krobutekin. The second chapter focuses on the main contents of the anarchism of the new century. The new century advocates overthrowing the political, economic and social power through the anarchist social revolution. The third chapter is the controversy between the anarchism of the New Century and the Qing Dynasty. They responded to the constitutional activities and revolutionary activities in full swing at that time. They not only severely criticized the activities of the Qing Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, but also attacked the revolutionaries' ideas of racial revolution. The difference is that, even though they have many differences with the revolutionaries, they still give the revolutionaries a lot of support and contribute to the unity of the revolutionary groups.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：K252;B25
本文编号：2402113
[Abstract]:The New Century School is an important faction in the Qing Dynasty to propagate anarchism thought. It is named for the establishment of the New Century Weekly. It is parallel with the Tianyi School of the same period as the two major schools of anarchist thought in the early period of China. The article mainly takes the weekly "New Century", which was founded by Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi in Paris in 1907, as the research material, and attempts to explore the true face of the anarchism thought of the new century school through the "New Century" Weekly. And then reveal the radical side of the revolutionary trend of thought in Qing Dynasty. In the revolutionary wave of Qing Dynasty, different factions in the revolutionary camp had different ideas about China's revolution. Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi, who studied in Europe, gradually embarked on the road of anarchist revolution because of the influence of western anarchism. In New Century Weekly they systematically explained anarchism thought that anarchism is not only possible but also a necessity of historical development. Because of the difference of ideas, the new century school argued with the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries. On the one hand, they vehemently criticized Kang Liang's constitutionalism activities; on the other hand, they asserted that the revolution led by the Alliance was not a revolution in the true sense. The real revolution should be an anarchist social revolution for most of society's happiness. The text of the article consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the establishment of anarchism in the new century. After Zhang Jingjiang and Li Shi went to France in 1902, Chu Minyi, Wu Zhihui and others went westward one after another, and in France they accepted the western anarchist thought. Then the New Century Weekly was founded to promote it and formed the New Century School to promote anarchism. But as far as their ideological origin is concerned, they carry on the anarchism of Barkunin and Krobutekin. The second chapter focuses on the main contents of the anarchism of the new century. The new century advocates overthrowing the political, economic and social power through the anarchist social revolution. The third chapter is the controversy between the anarchism of the New Century and the Qing Dynasty. They responded to the constitutional activities and revolutionary activities in full swing at that time. They not only severely criticized the activities of the Qing Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, but also attacked the revolutionaries' ideas of racial revolution. The difference is that, even though they have many differences with the revolutionaries, they still give the revolutionaries a lot of support and contribute to the unity of the revolutionary groups.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：K252;B25
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 蒋俊;“新世纪派”思想研究[J];文史哲;1991年02期
2 吴浪波;互助论在清末的传播与影响[J];中州学刊;2005年02期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 石威;清季新世纪派无政府主义思想研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
，本文编号：2402113
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2402113.html
