晚清民国山林所有权的获得与证明——浙江龙泉县与建德县的比较研究
发布时间：2019-02-26 13:10
【摘要】：各地山林在国家赋税体系中的不同地位,造成山林所有权确权方式的差异。无税山产的确认以契约为主要证据,而有税山林的鱼鳞山册以及在册书手中掌握的私册,也构成了诉讼纠纷中主要的证据。浙江省龙泉和建德两县分别是这两种情况的典型。因此,民国山林国有化、契税和不动产登记等一系列政策,对两地山林的确权产生了不同的影响。在此过程中,原来以契约为主要确权凭证的习惯以及由册书把持的、通过升科纳粮获得山林所有权的方式,都遭到了挑战,国家与山区民众之间的关系也变得更加紧密。
[Abstract]:The different position of mountain forest in the national tax system leads to the difference of the way of confirming the ownership of mountain forest. The confirmation of non-taxable mountain property is mainly based on the contract, and the fishscale mountain book of the taxable mountain forest and the private register held in the register hand also constitute the main evidence in the litigation dispute. Longquan and Jiande counties in Zhejiang Province are typical of these two cases respectively. Therefore, a series of policies, such as nationalization of mountain forest in the Republic of China, deed tax and registration of real estate, have had different influence on the right to confirm the mountain forest between the two places. In the process, the habit of using contract as the main certificate of power confirmation and the way of obtaining the ownership of mountain forest through ascending Kona grain under the control of books were challenged, and the relationship between the country and the people in mountain areas became closer.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学人文学院;
【基金】：香港特别行政区大学教育资助委员会卓越学科领域计划(第五轮)“中国社会的历史人类学”的资助 国家社科基金重大项目“龙泉司法档案整理与研究”(13&ZD151) 浙江省社科规划优势学科重大项目“从契约到土地产权状:近代浙江地权证明的习惯、诉讼与司法”(14YSXK04ZD—1YB)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K252
本文编号：2430799
[Abstract]:The different position of mountain forest in the national tax system leads to the difference of the way of confirming the ownership of mountain forest. The confirmation of non-taxable mountain property is mainly based on the contract, and the fishscale mountain book of the taxable mountain forest and the private register held in the register hand also constitute the main evidence in the litigation dispute. Longquan and Jiande counties in Zhejiang Province are typical of these two cases respectively. Therefore, a series of policies, such as nationalization of mountain forest in the Republic of China, deed tax and registration of real estate, have had different influence on the right to confirm the mountain forest between the two places. In the process, the habit of using contract as the main certificate of power confirmation and the way of obtaining the ownership of mountain forest through ascending Kona grain under the control of books were challenged, and the relationship between the country and the people in mountain areas became closer.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学人文学院;
【基金】：香港特别行政区大学教育资助委员会卓越学科领域计划(第五轮)“中国社会的历史人类学”的资助 国家社科基金重大项目“龙泉司法档案整理与研究”(13&ZD151) 浙江省社科规划优势学科重大项目“从契约到土地产权状:近代浙江地权证明的习惯、诉讼与司法”(14YSXK04ZD—1YB)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K252
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 廖海峰 记者 曹友春;为绿树成荫春常在[N];赣南日报;2014年
，本文编号：2430799
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2430799.html
