民初国学研究中“科学”范式的变迁——一个概念史的考察
发布时间：2019-06-14 18:14
【摘要】：中国"科学"是一个历史性的概念,晚清自日本输入后,就作为学术名词与传统学术的改造相伴相生。新文化运动时期,留美学生输入整体性"科学"概念,"科学"开始从一个宽泛的,以分科为特征的学术体系,向整体性的,以"科学方法和精神"为核心的思维方式转换,由此催生国学研究范式从"保存国粹"向"整理国故"过渡。两种范式之异点在于评判固有学术的价值标准发生转换,但于过渡之中亦可见晚清以来学术转型的内在统一性:学术改造以分科治学为起点,以"科学"为归属,注定这是一个与传统"分",与西学"合"的总体走向;近代学人大多是借用"科学"作为概念工具,试图在分科体系内妥善安置中西新旧,调和的主张一脉相承。
[Abstract]:Chinese "science" is a historical concept. Since the input of Japanese in the late Qing Dynasty, it has been accompanied by the transformation of traditional academic as an academic noun. During the New Culture Movement, the students studying in the United States inputted the concept of "science", and "science" began to change from a broad academic system characterized by different subjects to a holistic mode of thinking with "scientific method and spirit" as the core, thus giving birth to the transition of the paradigm of Chinese research from "preservation of quintessence" to "sorting out the national past". The difference between the two paradigm lies in the transformation of the value standard of judging the inherent academic, but in the transition, we can also see the internal unity of the academic transformation since the late Qing Dynasty: the academic transformation takes the subject study as the starting point and takes "science" as the belonging, which is doomed to be an overall trend of "dividing" with the traditional and "in line" with the western learning. Most modern scholars use "science" as a conceptual tool to try to properly settle the old and new ideas between China and the West in the branch system.
【作者单位】： 杭州师范大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目“近代中国科学概念的生成与歧变”(14FZS035)的成果之一
【分类号】：K092
本文编号：2499578
[Abstract]:Chinese "science" is a historical concept. Since the input of Japanese in the late Qing Dynasty, it has been accompanied by the transformation of traditional academic as an academic noun. During the New Culture Movement, the students studying in the United States inputted the concept of "science", and "science" began to change from a broad academic system characterized by different subjects to a holistic mode of thinking with "scientific method and spirit" as the core, thus giving birth to the transition of the paradigm of Chinese research from "preservation of quintessence" to "sorting out the national past". The difference between the two paradigm lies in the transformation of the value standard of judging the inherent academic, but in the transition, we can also see the internal unity of the academic transformation since the late Qing Dynasty: the academic transformation takes the subject study as the starting point and takes "science" as the belonging, which is doomed to be an overall trend of "dividing" with the traditional and "in line" with the western learning. Most modern scholars use "science" as a conceptual tool to try to properly settle the old and new ideas between China and the West in the branch system.
【作者单位】： 杭州师范大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目“近代中国科学概念的生成与歧变”(14FZS035)的成果之一
【分类号】：K092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 邓广铭;漫谈传统文化及其弘扬问题[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年06期
2 方言;国学研究出路何在[J];华夏文化;1995年05期
3 胡可涛;葛维春;;“国学热”现象的理性探析[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
4 卢毅;“整理国故运动”与国学研究的学科重建[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2004年06期
5 ;《国学集刊》即将出版[J];读书;1986年02期
6 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2499578
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2499578.html
