从密议、密函到明诏:天京事变爆发的复杂酝酿——兼辨太平天国的盛衰分水岭问题
发布时间:2019-08-04 11:27
【摘要】:天京事变的爆发经历了复杂的历史酝酿。经探析,洪、韦、石三巨头"同盟密议"及杨秀清"逼封万岁"事实存在的可能性很大;并有如下新的见解得出:一、事变前,韦昌辉、石达开、秦日纲同时向天京方向移动,最大可能是接受了杨秀清的调令,而非过去学界认为的怀揣密诏,秘密回京;二、洪秀全下达的是具有突发性和非正式性的"密函",而非"密诏","诛杨密诏"并不存在;三、杨秀清被杀的时间被洪秀全人为地前置于9月2日,"东升日"很可能在9月5日;四、事变前夕,洪秀全下达诛杨明诏,诛杨实践发展到"公开声讨"的阶段,并非过去学界认为的洪在事变中一直是暗处操控;五、天京事变是在必然因素与可变因素的复杂交织中呈现于后人的历史记忆。查其影响,天京事变对太平天国的折损尚不能以"盛衰分水岭"定位。太平天国由战略进攻、战略防御转入战略退却并非以一个历史事件为标志,而是经历了由量到质的演变。太平天国的战略全局是在1860—1862年一段时间之内发生转变的。贯穿太平天国始终的权力斗争,其地方内耗的影响因子尤为不可忽视。
[Abstract]:The outbreak of the Tianjing incident has experienced a complex historical brewing. Through analysis, Hong, Wei, Shi Big three "alliance secret discussion" and Yang Xiuqing "forced seal long live" fact existence is very likely, and has the following new opinion: first, before the incident, Wei Changhui, Shi Dakai, Qin Rigang moved in the direction of Tianjing at the same time, the most likely is to accept Yang Xiuqing's order, instead of carrying the secret zhao and secretly returning to Beijing as thought by the academic circles in the past; Second, Hong Xiuquan issued a "secret letter" with sudden and informal nature, not a "secret letter", and "Zhu Yang Mizhao" did not exist. Third, the time when Yang Xiuqing was killed was artificially placed by Hong Xiuquan on September 2, and "Dongsheng Japan" is likely to be on September 5. Fourth, on the eve of the incident, Hong Xiuquan issued Zhu Yang Mingzhao, and the practice of Zhu Yang developed to the stage of "public denunciation". It was not believed that Hong had been manipulated in the dark in the past; fifthly, the Tianjing incident was presented in the historical memory of future generations in the complex interweaving of inevitable factors and variable factors. To investigate the influence of the Tianjing incident on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the damage to the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom can not be positioned as a watershed between prosperity and decline. The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom changed from strategic attack and strategic defense to strategic retreat not marked by a historical event, but experienced an evolution from quantity to quality. The strategic situation of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom changed from 1860 to 1862. Throughout the power struggle of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the influencing factors of local internal friction can not be ignored.
【作者单位】: 中国政法大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】:北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(中国政法大学)“马克思主义与全面依法治国”阶段性成果 国家清史纂修工程项目“通纪第六卷”(项目编号:200410120103006);国家清史纂修工程项目“传记—类传—农民领袖”(项目编号:200510120304010)相关研究成果
【分类号】:K254
本文编号:2522912
[Abstract]:The outbreak of the Tianjing incident has experienced a complex historical brewing. Through analysis, Hong, Wei, Shi Big three "alliance secret discussion" and Yang Xiuqing "forced seal long live" fact existence is very likely, and has the following new opinion: first, before the incident, Wei Changhui, Shi Dakai, Qin Rigang moved in the direction of Tianjing at the same time, the most likely is to accept Yang Xiuqing's order, instead of carrying the secret zhao and secretly returning to Beijing as thought by the academic circles in the past; Second, Hong Xiuquan issued a "secret letter" with sudden and informal nature, not a "secret letter", and "Zhu Yang Mizhao" did not exist. Third, the time when Yang Xiuqing was killed was artificially placed by Hong Xiuquan on September 2, and "Dongsheng Japan" is likely to be on September 5. Fourth, on the eve of the incident, Hong Xiuquan issued Zhu Yang Mingzhao, and the practice of Zhu Yang developed to the stage of "public denunciation". It was not believed that Hong had been manipulated in the dark in the past; fifthly, the Tianjing incident was presented in the historical memory of future generations in the complex interweaving of inevitable factors and variable factors. To investigate the influence of the Tianjing incident on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the damage to the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom can not be positioned as a watershed between prosperity and decline. The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom changed from strategic attack and strategic defense to strategic retreat not marked by a historical event, but experienced an evolution from quantity to quality. The strategic situation of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom changed from 1860 to 1862. Throughout the power struggle of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the influencing factors of local internal friction can not be ignored.
【作者单位】: 中国政法大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】:北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(中国政法大学)“马克思主义与全面依法治国”阶段性成果 国家清史纂修工程项目“通纪第六卷”(项目编号:200410120103006);国家清史纂修工程项目“传记—类传—农民领袖”(项目编号:200510120304010)相关研究成果
【分类号】:K254
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马鼎盛;略论天京事变中的洪杨是非[J];学术论坛;1981年06期
2 方仲飞;;从太平军六下祁门看其军事力量的变化,并谈“天京事变”的影响[J];安徽史学;1984年05期
3 向德富;;天京事变探源[J];荆州师专学报;1990年04期
4 闭雄壮;;天京事变发生原因——从权力结构角度论证[J];沧桑;2012年06期
5 厉保纯;刘英伟;蔡淑洁;赵淑兰;;略论“天京事变”及其历史教训[J];山东师院学报(社会科学版);1976年03期
6 纵瑞华;;漫谈“天京事变”及其它——读史扎记[J];青海师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1980年01期
7 施伟国 ,张伟成;关于天京事变中几个问题的考辨[J];苏州大学学报;1986年01期
8 杨华伟;韦昌辉在天京事变中的责任考辨[J];新疆石油教育学院学报;1989年Z1期
9 王乐群;一策解京危[J];安徽决策咨询;1994年12期
10 廖胜,王晓南;天京事变的心态探由[J];绵阳师范高等专科学校学报;1997年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 复旦大学历史系教授 戴鞍钢;盛衰分水岭:太平天国的天京事变[N];团结报;2014年
2 李乔;天国遗恨说洪杨[N];北京日报;2000年
,本文编号:2522912
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2522912.html