试论战后方豪的台湾史研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 14:11

本文选题：方豪　切入点：台湾史　出处：《台湾研究集刊》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：方豪早期以中西交通史研究闻名于学界。1949年赴台后,转治台湾史。这一方面是其好治"近身之学"的演进,一方面则是出于对日本学者台湾研究的不满,以及对台湾文献散佚的忧心。方氏侧重于对以清代台湾方志为主的台湾文献的搜集与整理,同时亦对台湾宗教史、台湾"郊"等作专题研究。综合来看,方氏将台湾史置于中国史框架之下,将其作为中国地方史进行研究,并表现出强烈的爱国情怀。同时,在研究的过程中秉承史料学派的治学方法,重视史料学和校勘学的运用。当然,由于受时代条件及个人因素制约,导致其在研究中存在如偏重考据而鲜有疏通、下笔过快而时有错误、宗教情感影响学术等不足。
[Abstract]:Fang Hao was famous in the academic circles for his early study of the history of Chinese and Western traffic. After he went to Taiwan in 1949, he switched to the history of Taiwan. This was partly the evolution of his "close study," and on the other hand, he was dissatisfied with the study of Taiwan by Japanese scholars. And his concern for the loss of Taiwan literature. Fang focused on the collection and collation of Taiwan literature, which was dominated by Taiwan's local chronicles in the Qing Dynasty, and also made special studies on Taiwan's religious history, "suburbs" of Taiwan, and so on. Fang put the history of Taiwan under the framework of Chinese history, studied it as a local history of China, and showed strong patriotic feelings. At the same time, in the course of the study, he inherited the research methods of the historical materials school. The application of historical materials and collation is emphasized. Of course, due to the constraints of the times and personal factors, there are some problems in the research, such as emphasizing on textual research, making mistakes when writing too fast, and influencing the academic research by religious emotion, and so on.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学历史系;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“六十年来台湾的社会思潮与人文学术研究(1950—2010)”(14BZS125)
【分类号】：K29

【相似文献】