村庄调查的“志”与“史”——以《盘村瑶族》为例

发布时间：2018-05-08 11:26

本文选题：民族志 + 瑶族　；参考：《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：《盘村瑶族》尽管是《花蓝瑶社会组织》的后续研究,却是一部"史志合璧"之作,堪称建构费孝通"历史功能论"理论大厦的一块厚重奠基石。从民族志撰写与历史文献利用的角度来看,我们对《盘村瑶族》等前辈民族学家的作品,既不能完全依据英美标准"马凌诺斯基式民族志"的尺度来衡量,也不应忽略历史情境、在"主体性"方面予以过度诠释。新中国成立之后到学科重建之前的中国民族研究,对世界人类学做出了自己的独特贡献。
[Abstract]:Although a follow-up study of Hualanyao's Social Organization, Pancun Yao is a work of "the combination of Historical Records", which can be regarded as the foundation stone of constructing the theoretical edifice of Fei Xiaotong's "Historical function Theory". From the perspective of ethnography writing and the utilization of historical documents, we cannot measure the works of the previous generations of ethnologists, such as Pan Village Yao, according to the Anglo-American standard of "Malinowski ethnography." Also should not ignore the historical situation, in the "subjectivity" to give excessive interpretation. The study of Chinese nationalities from the founding of New China to the re-establishment of disciplines has made its own unique contribution to world anthropology.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院;中国人民大学社会与人口学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“人类学的国家传统及其创新研究”(12CMZ018) 霍英东教育基金会基础性研究课题资助项目(141094)
【分类号】：K29

【相似文献】