地方志工作与出版编辑工作关系辨析

发布时间：2018-08-03 17:40

【摘要】：近年来,由于地方志工作机构参照《公务员法》管理,因此有人主张地方志工作重行政管理事务轻编辑专业技术工作,乃至主张将编辑工作完全交给出版社,对于此观点,笔者认为地方志工作与出版编辑工作有密不可分的关系,甚至是一个整体,是地方志编纂工作的延伸;目前不宜急于将出版编辑工作从地方志工作机构的专业人员职责中剥离出来,尤其是省级志书的编修,剥离编辑工作是不可能的;首轮修志耗时太长是客观现实(地方志工作机构的业务人员参与出版编辑工作仅仅是原因之一,但不是唯一原因),是第二轮修志值得重视和着手解决的现实问题。修志机构专业人员和出版社专业编辑工作各有侧重,不可或缺,修志工作急需二者兼备的专业人才,应强化修志工作中的编辑工作而不是削弱和剥离。
[Abstract]:In recent years, because the local chronicles work organization refers to the management of the Civil servant Law, some people advocate that the local chronicle work should pay more attention to the administrative affairs than the professional technical work of editing, and even that the editing work should be handed over entirely to the publishing house. The author thinks that the work of local chronicles is closely related to the work of publishing and editing, even a whole, which is an extension of the compilation of local chronicles. At present, it is not necessary to divest the publishing and editing work from the professional duties of the local chronicle organizations, especially the compilation of provincial chronicles. It is impossible to peel off the editing work. It is an objective reality that the first round of annals takes too long to be revised (the participation of local staff in publishing and editing is only one of the reasons, but it is not the only reason), and it is also a practical problem that deserves to be paid attention to and solved in the second round. The professional personnel of the annals revision organization and the professional editor of the publishing house have their own emphases and indispensable. The revision of the annals is in urgent need of both professional talents, so the editorial work in the annals should be strengthened rather than weakened and stripped.
【作者单位】：广西地方志办公室;
【分类号】：K29

【参考文献】