论民国方志体例大类目的变革

发布时间：2018-08-29 14:30

【摘要】：方志学作为史学的一支,和史学一样同样受着西方知识系统的逐渐引进而发生变革。方志类目的变化反映了西方知识系统的影响,而方志类目的现代化首先出现在乡土志中,同时在晚清的县志中也出现了反映现代社会的新类目。在编纂实践中,方志编纂者和方志学家在使方志编纂和方志学融入现代知识系统的困难,反映了两大古今知识系统的矛盾,而要将两大知识系统融合,方志编纂采取了如同史学的专门化整理,即将方志学内容自然科学化和社会科学化。总之,方志编纂不是简单地用新的门类和名称将志料概括和表述的问题,问题实质是一个学理问题,即西方知识系统中的西方学术分科体系在方志编纂中的深化。方志编纂只有运用现代知识系统大类目,来重新归类方志内容,才能使得方志走向全新的社会主义方志。
[Abstract]:As a branch of historiography, Fangzhi, like historiography, was transformed by the gradual introduction of western knowledge system. The change of local chronicles reflects the influence of the western knowledge system, and the modernization of local chronicles first appeared in the local records, at the same time, in the county records of the late Qing Dynasty, there were also new categories reflecting the modern society. In the practice of compilation, the difficulties of compiling local chronicles and integrating local chronology into modern knowledge system reflect the contradiction between the two ancient and modern knowledge systems, and the two great knowledge systems should be merged. The compilation of local chronicles adopts the specialized arrangement of historiography, that is, the natural science and social science of the contents of local chronology. In a word, the compilation of local chronicles is not simply a question of generalizing and expressing the chronicles with new categories and names. The essence of the problem is a theoretical problem, that is, the deepening of the western academic branch system in the western knowledge system in the compilation of local chronicles. Only by using modern knowledge system to reclassify the contents of local chronicles can local chronicles move towards a new socialist local chronicles.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学历史系;
【分类号】：K29

【参考文献】