“现地语史料第一主义”与历史书写
发布时间：2019-06-17 15:38
【摘要】：冯建勇认为民族国家体系、殖民主义理论可用于解释西欧国家历史疆域和当代世界国家边界形成的一般过程,但亦应观察到民族国家体系、殖民主义理论是由特定经验条件催生的规范性体系。用这些理论解释中国历史疆域问题并不具有历史应然的超越性,对于中国而言,前近代王朝国家"天下主义"的疆域观维系中国历史疆域形态的解释,尊重了中国的历史、传统和文化,无疑更具历史合理性。李鸿宾认为唐建立了兼跨长城南北两种(或多种)迥然有别的地域及其族群为一体的政权,并成功地实施达五十余年,主要建基于传统的天下观的思想意识,尤其是统治集团北方胡系文化血脉的促动使然。南北的兼跨,使得长城边缘地带的特性丧失,它转而成为沟通南北东西的战略要地。这样的尝试为后来蒙古和满洲贵族势力构建一统化异质型帝国奠定了新的基础。长城地带意涵的本质是中国传统王朝国家不断建构与变迁的展现。姚大力认为面对边疆民族史研究的主位取径以及对于族群认同问题的新认识,现地语史料的重要性只会变得越来越突出。因为大量的主位叙事,以及与主位叙事密切相关的其他种种历史信息,事实上是蕴藏在现地语史料之中。历史书写往上走必须上升到理论的宏观层面;向下走必须坐落在细部考察与分析所必不可少的精密技术的基础上。高亚滨认为新疆南疆绿洲社会因其独特的自然生态环境而形成了具有强烈地方特征的社会文化结构,就现代国家的发展要求来看,这种文化结构则成为落后、保守的象征,需要国家力量的介入以完成社会的现代化。从生态环境、文化网络的角度理解绿洲社会的权力结构,则为探讨边疆地域社会现代化的历史进程提供一种知识话语的可能。
[Abstract]:Feng Jianyong believes that the theory of colonialism can be used to explain the general process of the formation of the historical territory of Western European countries and the boundary of contemporary world countries, but it should also be observed that the colonial theory is a normative system spawned by specific empirical conditions. Using these theories to explain the problem of Chinese historical territory does not have the transcendence of history. For China, the territorial view of "earthly doctrine" of the pre-modern dynasty country maintains the interpretation of Chinese historical territory form, respects the history, tradition and culture of China, and undoubtedly has more historical rationality. Li Hongbin believed that Tang Dynasty established two kinds of regimes (or many kinds) that were very different from the north and south of the Great Wall, and successfully implemented them for more than 50 years, mainly based on the traditional ideological consciousness of the view of the world, especially the promotion of the cultural blood of the Hu system in the north of the ruling group. The combination of north and south makes the characteristics of the edge of the Great Wall lose, and it becomes a strategic place to communicate between the north and the west. Such an attempt laid a new foundation for the later Mongolian and Manchuria aristocratic forces to build a unified heterogeneous empire. The essence of the meaning of the Great Wall is the continuous construction and change of Chinese traditional dynastic countries. Yao strongly believes that in the face of the thematic path of the study of frontier national history and the new understanding of ethnic identity, the importance of local language historical materials will only become more and more prominent. Because a large number of thematic narration, as well as all kinds of other historical information closely related to thematic narration, are in fact contained in the historical data of local language. The upward writing of history must rise to the macro level of theory, and the downward movement must be based on the precision techniques necessary for detailed investigation and analysis. Gao Yabin believes that the oasis society in southern Xinjiang has formed a social and cultural structure with strong local characteristics because of its unique natural ecological environment. As far as the development requirements of modern countries are concerned, this cultural structure has become a symbol of backwardness and conservatism, and needs the intervention of state strength to complete the modernization of society. Understanding the power structure of oasis society from the perspective of ecological environment and cultural network provides a possibility of knowledge discourse for exploring the historical process of social modernization in frontier regions.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学历史地理研究所;
【分类号】：K29
本文编号：2501089
[Abstract]:Feng Jianyong believes that the theory of colonialism can be used to explain the general process of the formation of the historical territory of Western European countries and the boundary of contemporary world countries, but it should also be observed that the colonial theory is a normative system spawned by specific empirical conditions. Using these theories to explain the problem of Chinese historical territory does not have the transcendence of history. For China, the territorial view of "earthly doctrine" of the pre-modern dynasty country maintains the interpretation of Chinese historical territory form, respects the history, tradition and culture of China, and undoubtedly has more historical rationality. Li Hongbin believed that Tang Dynasty established two kinds of regimes (or many kinds) that were very different from the north and south of the Great Wall, and successfully implemented them for more than 50 years, mainly based on the traditional ideological consciousness of the view of the world, especially the promotion of the cultural blood of the Hu system in the north of the ruling group. The combination of north and south makes the characteristics of the edge of the Great Wall lose, and it becomes a strategic place to communicate between the north and the west. Such an attempt laid a new foundation for the later Mongolian and Manchuria aristocratic forces to build a unified heterogeneous empire. The essence of the meaning of the Great Wall is the continuous construction and change of Chinese traditional dynastic countries. Yao strongly believes that in the face of the thematic path of the study of frontier national history and the new understanding of ethnic identity, the importance of local language historical materials will only become more and more prominent. Because a large number of thematic narration, as well as all kinds of other historical information closely related to thematic narration, are in fact contained in the historical data of local language. The upward writing of history must rise to the macro level of theory, and the downward movement must be based on the precision techniques necessary for detailed investigation and analysis. Gao Yabin believes that the oasis society in southern Xinjiang has formed a social and cultural structure with strong local characteristics because of its unique natural ecological environment. As far as the development requirements of modern countries are concerned, this cultural structure has become a symbol of backwardness and conservatism, and needs the intervention of state strength to complete the modernization of society. Understanding the power structure of oasis society from the perspective of ecological environment and cultural network provides a possibility of knowledge discourse for exploring the historical process of social modernization in frontier regions.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学历史地理研究所;
【分类号】：K29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 杨经华;;书写与歧视——“夜郎自大”现象与少数民族历史的异化[J];贵州民族研究;2007年04期
2 刘宗迪;;英雄祖先与弟兄民族:根基历史的文本与情境[J];民俗研究;2009年04期
3 龙其林;;澳门的历史与澳门的历史书写——兼论澳门史著的“文化使命”及其他[J];广西社会科学;2012年03期
，本文编号：2501089
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2501089.html
