《史记》所载秦代史事辨疑
发布时间:2018-01-06 19:24
本文关键词:《史记》所载秦代史事辨疑 出处:《内蒙古大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:《史记》面世以来遭改窜增补一事,前人所论甚多。而由于秦朝政府与儒家学派结怨太深,秦代史料遭到的恶意篡改尤为严重。今本《史记》中这样的问题史料颇多,主要集中在《秦始皇本纪》、《吕不韦列传》、《李斯列传》中,其中以《李斯列传》后半部分最为严重。《吕不韦列传》所载“邯郸献姬”一事前后矛盾,难以采信。《李斯列传》所载秦二世“责问”李斯之辞及李斯以“督责之书”献媚一事显系仇视法家者刻意诬陷,尤其是“督责之书”以贬义词献媚,完全不合情理,绝非李斯所作;李斯之死、二世之死太过离奇曲折,其中李斯之死一事前后矛盾处尤多,极不可信。《秦始皇本纪》叙事相对合理,李斯、二世之死及李斯被杀时间皆当以之为准,但《秦始皇本纪》在“尉缭评秦王”、“二世杀诸公子并下诏复修阿房宫”、“指鹿为马”等事的行文上亦存在窜乱痕迹,尤其是所谓“指鹿为马”一事的发生时间,实当为秦二世被杀的时间。此外,“始皇自称‘真人’不称朕”一事亦当系夸大;“沙丘之谋”等事有诸多疑点,应以存疑的态度视之。
[Abstract]:< > was published since records of a previous falsify supplement, on a lot. But because of the government and the Confucian School of Qin Dynasty was the historical grudges too deep, malicious tampering is particularly serious. This problem the < > in historical records are mainly concentrated in the "Qin Shihuang Ji >, < < li >. Two columns. Adams biography >, < > which Li Si biographies second part is most serious. LV Buwei biographies contained in the" Handan Xian Ji > "thing contradictory, it is difficult to adopt. Li Si contained biographies > Qin" questioned "Li Sizhi speech and Li Si to" accountability book "with a significant hostile Legalists are deliberately framed, especially the" accountability book "in a derogatory term when utterly illogical, not made by Li Si; the death of Li Sizhi II, the death was too bizarre twists and turns, which before and after the death of Li Sizhi a contradiction, and more particularly, unreliable. Qin Shihuang Ji > narrative is relatively reasonable, Li Adams, and the death of Li Si II was killed when all the time to prevail, but this is Qin Shihuang in the "weiliaozi < > the rating", "kill the son Xiazhao II and the restoration of Epang Palace", "there is also the channeling chaos traces of this and other things, especially the occurrence time of the so-called" this is a real thing, when the Qin II killed time. In addition, "he describes himself as a" reality "is not a thing when I said" is exaggerated; "dune plan" that has many doubts, doubts about the attitude should be considered.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:K233
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈世;;论秦二世不是赵高的傀儡[J];湖南人文科技学院学报;2006年02期
2 王举忠;李斯杀韩非原因考辨[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1981年01期
3 王举忠;李斯杀韩非原因再考辨[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1985年04期
4 严宾;碣石新考[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年03期
5 李开元;;末代楚王史迹钩沉——补《史记》昌平君列传[J];史学集刊;2010年01期
6 李开元;;焚书坑儒的真伪虚实——半桩伪造的历史[J];史学集刊;2010年06期
7 李开元;;说赵高不是宦阉——补《史记·赵高列传》[J];史学月刊;2007年08期
8 何法周;;《尉缭子》初探[J];文物;1977年02期
9 刘庆柱;;秦阿房宫遗址的考古发现与研究——兼谈历史资料的科学性与真实性[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年02期
10 马世年;;韩非二次使秦考[J];中国文化研究;2008年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 徐志斌;;秦二世胡亥夺位说质疑[A];司马迁与《史记》学术研讨会会议手册[C];2007年
,本文编号:1389204
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/1389204.html