汉文化形成中的“巫蛊”考义、嬗变与规制——以西汉年间巫蛊案为线索

发布时间：2018-01-22 00:27

  本文关键词： 巫职 楚地巫风 巫蛊之祸 文化冲突与融合　出处：《西南政法大学学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：根据正史,"巫蛊"二字的习惯性合用肇始于汉武帝征和年间的巫蛊之祸。学者论及巫蛊,往往杂糅厌魅、蛊毒、左道、谶纬、妖言等多种行为一并探讨,但对巫与蛊的本质区别以及巫蛊之祸本身,并未结合历史、法律与文化多个层面作出更细致的考察。巫者与史家同源已成为学界既定之论,这一群体在上古时期掌卜筮祭祀,社会地位极高;而左道、厌胜等蛊术却多为后世律令明确禁止。巫蛊案的发生、巫蛊语义的变迁,表征着汉代官方对巫者态度转变,背后所暗藏的是地域与族群,官方古典与民俗等多个系统之间的文化传播、冲突与融合。
[Abstract]:According to the official history, the habitual combination of the word "witchcraft" originated from the evil of witchcraft and witchcraft in the reign of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. When scholars talk about witchcraft, they often mix sorcery, poison, left way, prophecy, evil words and so on. However, the essential difference between witchcraft and the evil of witchcraft and witchcraft itself has not been combined with history, law and culture to make a more detailed investigation. The origin of witchcraft and historian has become the established theory in academic circles. In ancient times, this group held divination and sacrifice, and its social status was very high. But Zuo Dao, such as disgust to win and so on, is forbidden explicitly for later generations. The occurrence of witchcraft case and the vicissitudes of witchcraft semantics represent the change of the official attitude towards the witchcraft in the Han Dynasty, behind which lies the region and the ethnic group. Cultural communication, conflict and integration between official classical and folklore systems.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学研究生教育院;
【分类号】：K234.1
【正文快照】： 谈到巫术,理性的现代人多数会将其等同于迷信或骗术。英国人类学家弗雷泽在其著作《金枝》中,一方面认为巫术是一种伪科学,即被歪曲了的自然规律;另一方面则以人类思维形态由类比向逻辑的发展为线索,分析了巫术中的模拟、类比、接触等原理与方法,认为它实际上与近世科学思维非，

本文编号：1453025