清初贰臣问题评骘话语的弹性空间

发布时间：2018-01-22 08:55

  本文关键词： 贰臣 评骘话语 弹性空间 话语权 等差格局　出处：《北京社会科学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：评骘话语是清初士林观照贰臣气节问题的常态化表达方式。在理学主导的明清社会,关于贰臣问题的评骘话语表达难以悖离君臣伦理的总体规范,但并非是对伦理规范毫无参差地亦步亦趋,而是存在一定幅度的弹性空间。从不同视阈来看,话语弹性空间表现为士人情感与情绪的不同趋向性空间、评骘尺度把握的游移性空间以及话语载体在文本风格上的夸饰性空间。弹性空间的形成,从细节来看,有评骘者自身的种种动因,从根本来看,道德话语权的等差格局是其内在支撑。
[Abstract]:The comment on stallion discourse is a regular way of expressing the moral integrity of Schilling in the early Qing Dynasty. In the Ming and Qing society dominated by Neo-Confucianism, the comment on the issue of "two ministers" can hardly be expressed against the general norms of the ethics of the monarch and minister. However, it is not the same as the ethical norms, but there is a certain extent of elastic space. From different perspectives, the discourse elasticity space is the different tendency space of the scholars' emotion and emotion. The floating space grasped by the stallion and the ostentatious space of the discourse carrier in the text style. The formation of the elastic space, from the details, there are all sorts of motives of the critics themselves, from the fundamental point of view. The isomorphism pattern of moral discourse right is its internal support.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学文学院;
【分类号】：B82-051;K249
【正文快照】： 明清易代之际,士人在政治路向的二难选择中气节失守严重,形成了规模庞大的贰臣群体。“贰臣”是基于政治伦理的节操定谳,士林对于贰臣气节问题的历史观照,或是贰臣的自我审视,往往都会涉及到种种评骘话语的表达。在理学上升为国家意识形态的明清社会,君臣大节和华夷民族观是士，

本文编号：1454277