《春秋》左氏学的兴盛与学术的变化
本文关键词: 《春秋》三传 今古文论争 双重属性 兴盛 学术变化 出处:《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:孔子据鲁史而作《春秋》,借《春秋》之言来褒贬、正礼制,被后世奉为圣人经典。然圣人之义非常人所能通晓,故出现解经之作,《左传》即是其中之一。作为“《春秋》三传”之一,《左传》是极为特殊的存在,在今文经学家的打压之下,却逆势而上成为显学。为此本文拟从《左传》以及《春秋》左氏学为出发点,探寻《左传》的不同之处,《春秋》左氏学的兴盛历程、以及其何以能长久兴盛不衰等问题。本文从三个大的方面展开论述,第一部分为探讨《左传》以及《春秋》左氏学的形成与发展历程,将《春秋》左氏学兴盛放在其时代发展的背景下加以思考。其主要包括《左传》与《春秋》之间的关系,《左传》自身的特性为何:述史与传经,以及在两汉发展史上占据重要位置的今古文论争中《左传》扮演着怎样的角色与地位。这一部分将对《左传》形成整体性的认知起到帮助。第二部分为采用不同的角度来观察《春秋》左氏学如何走向兴盛以及兴盛的具体表现。其中包括经学视域与史学视域。经学方面阐述《春秋》左氏学如何一步步完成从地位低微至成为政府科举选官之准则,即东汉时期的蓬勃发展;三国时期《春秋》左氏学实现与今文经学地位翻转;两晋时期,《春秋经传集解》助《春秋》左氏学登上新的台阶;以及唐代《左传正义》的颁定,使《左传》成为科举考试之标准,从而达到巅峰。而文史方面:阐述历代文史学者对《左传》的具体态度,文史大家们对《左传》的肯定,从侧面推动了《左传》影响力的加强。第三部分则着重分析从学术角度来看,《春秋》左氏学凭借哪些因素能以弱势地位成为当世之显学,如《左传》自身的解经特点、学风的变化对学术发展的影响、《左传》不断地完善自身、兼采今古经学之长的影响,后世学者对《春秋》三传的不断研究也是推动《春秋》左氏学向前发展的动力。总的来说,《左传》所具有的史学思想、原则以及其“史、义”结合的内涵,使其在经学、史学领域有着重要影响,“经”与“史”在《左传》上体现了微妙的平衡关系。纵使《左传》为伪作,也丝毫不会对其学术价值产生影响。
[Abstract]:Confucius wrote "Spring and Autumn" according to the history of Lu, by the words of "Spring and Autumn" to praise and derogate, the proper ritual system, is regarded as a sage classic, but the meaning of saints can not be understood by ordinary people, so there is the interpretation of the Sutra. Zuo Zhuan is one of them. As one of the three legends of the Spring and Autumn period, Zuo Zhuan is a very special existence, under the pressure of the scholars of the Confucian classics. Therefore, this paper intends to explore the differences of Zuo Zhuan and the prosperous course of Zuo's study from the perspective of Zuo Zhuan and Chun Qiu's study. The first part is to discuss the formation and development of Zuozhuan and Chun Qiu. It mainly includes the relationship between Zuo Zhuan and the Spring and Autumn period, and the characteristics of Zuo Zhuan. And the role and position of Zuo Zhuan in the debate of ancient Chinese prose, which occupies an important position in the history of the Han Dynasty. This part will help to form the whole cognition of Zuo Zhuan. The second part is to adopt different methods. From the perspective of "Spring and Autumn", how Zuo's studies become prosperous and the concrete manifestation of prosperity, including the field of view of Confucian classics and the field of historiography. In the aspect of Confucian studies, it explains how Zuo's studies have completed from the low to the lowest level step by step. Guidelines for the selection of officials for the Government Imperial examination. That is, the vigorous development of the Eastern Han Dynasty; The realization of Zuo's study in the period of the three Kingdoms and the reversal of the status of modern literary classics; In the period of Jin Dynasty, the interpretation of "Spring and Autumn Classic Biography" helped the "Spring and Autumn period" Zuo's study to rise to a new level; And the Tang Dynasty "Zuo Zhuan Justice", so that "Zuo Zhuan" became the standard of the imperial examination, so as to reach the peak. And literature and history: explain the history of the specific attitude of scholars to Zuo Zhuan. The affirmation of Zuo Zhuan has promoted the strengthening of Zuo Zhuan's influence from the side. The third part focuses on the analysis from the academic point of view. "Spring and Autumn" Zuo's study depends on what factors can become the status of weakness in the world, such as the characteristics of Zuo Zhuan's own interpretation of the classics, the influence of the change of the style of study on the academic development, and the continuous improvement of the "Zuo Zhuan". At the same time, with the influence of the ancient classics, the continuous research of the three legends of the Spring and Autumn period is also the driving force to promote the development of Zuo's study. In general, Zuo Zhuan has the historical thought of "Zuo Zhuan". The principle and its connotation of "history and righteousness" make it have an important influence in the field of classics and historiography. The "classics" and "history" embody a delicate balance in Zuo Zhuan, even though Zuo Zhuan is a fake. Nor does it affect its academic value at all.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K225.04
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜广辉;邓林;;今文经学与古文经学再认识——从经学史的分派谈起[J];哲学研究;2016年02期
2 李明泽;;近十年《春秋谷梁传》研究综述[J];名作欣赏;2016年03期
3 李华;;《左传》训诂术语和内容以及训释词义的方法[J];宁夏师范学院学报;2015年01期
4 周倩;;近二十年经史关系问题研究述评[J];史学理论与史学史学刊;2014年00期
5 丁鼎;;汉代今、古文经学研究二题[J];史林;2013年06期
6 夏继先;;“史鉴”与“叙史”之别——从《国语》与《左传》的叙事结构差异看二者的编纂目的[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2013年06期
7 王小虎;;论东汉今古文经学的融合[J];洛阳师范学院学报;2013年06期
8 宗瑞仙;;东汉末年经学教育衰微原因述略[J];齐鲁师范学院学报;2012年03期
9 许雪涛;;何休公羊三世说及其解经方法[J];学术研究;2011年04期
10 吕海龙;;论“文史两分”认识的三阶段——兼论《史通》在此过程中的理论意义[J];齐鲁学刊;2011年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 程水金;;论《公羊传》的历史褒贬及其文化渐进观[A];《春秋》三传与经学文化[C];2009年
2 耿纪平;;《春秋》三传义理通贯说[A];《春秋》三传与经学文化[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 黄文丽;历史与文学[D];山东大学;2015年
2 孙旭红;居今与志古:宋代《春秋》学研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
3 金永健;清代《左传》考证研究[D];扬州大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 朱翠翠;《左传》与汉代今古文经学之争[D];聊城大学;2013年
2 宋淑华;陆淳《春秋》三书研究[D];山东师范大学;2012年
3 张莉明;论《文心雕龙》对《史通》的影响[D];山东大学;2012年
4 李凯;《左传》“君子曰”研究[D];陕西师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:1488169
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/1488169.html