近年来学界关于民主、专制及传统文化的讨论——兼及相关理论与研究方法的探讨

发布时间：2018-02-10 12:55

本文关键词： 专制民主君主制中央集权儒家文化　出处：《史学月刊》2012年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近年来,学界对于中国古代的政治制度展开了热烈的讨论,有人认为中国古代政治制度不一定是专制的;还有人颂扬古代君主制和专制主义中央集权制度,甚至提倡"尊王"、"忠君",从而进一步肯定儒家文化的积极作用。这些新论引起学界的广泛关注,也遇到不少学者的商榷。"赞同中国古代政体者"的共同缺陷是以论代史以及概念、逻辑运用混乱,以致否定现代知识分子爱国、救国的行为和思想。论争中揭示出的一些问题,如儒家文化与专制主义王权的关系、专制主义中央集权的历史作用、古代帝王的历史作用等等,都是历史学中具有普遍性的理论问题。中国古代政体属于专制制度,应当深刻批判和反思。
[Abstract]:In recent years, scholars have launched a heated discussion on the political system of ancient China. Some people think that the ancient Chinese political system is not necessarily autocratic, and others celebrate the ancient monarchy and the centralization of autocracy. They even advocated "respecting the king" and "being loyal to the monarch", thus further affirming the positive role of Confucian culture. It is also discussed by many scholars. The common defect of "those who agree with the ancient Chinese polity" is that they use the history of the generation and the concept, and the logic is confused, thus negating the patriotic behavior and thinking of the modern intellectuals and saving the country. Some problems revealed in the controversy. For example, the relationship between Confucian culture and autocratic Wang Quan, the historical role of authoritarian centralization, the historical role of ancient emperors, and so on, are universal theoretical problems in history. We should deeply criticize and reflect on it.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】：K203

【相似文献】