周必大、朱熹与吕、范解仇公案——兼论南宋政治上的调和思想

发布时间：2018-02-14 14:53

  本文关键词： 欧阳修 周必大 朱熹 党争 调和　出处：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：由欧阳修撰写《范公神道碑》而引出的范仲淹与吕夷简解仇公案,在南宋庆元年间引起了周必大与朱熹之间的激烈争论,前者认为吕、范始终未曾解仇,后者则坚持两人确有解仇之事。但周、朱两人争论的实质并不在于对是否解仇进行事实判定,而是两种非常不同的关于党争的政治思想间的交锋。周必大在政治上信奉调和思想,坚持朝廷用人当不分党派,兼收并蓄。朱熹则主张政治的首要之务在区分"君子""小人",坚决反对两者杂用的调和倾向。在整个南宋时期,两种思想皆不乏追随者,但总体上看,周必大所代表的调和思想获得更多青睐,调和构成了南宋政治的一个重要特征。
[Abstract]:The case of Fan Zhongyan and Lu Yijian, which was led by Ouyang Xiu to write "the monument of Fan Gong Shen Dao", caused a fierce dispute between Zhou Bi-da and Zhu Xi during the Qing Yuan Dynasty of the Southern Song Dynasty. The former thought that Lu and Fan had never solved their feuds. The latter insisted that the two men did resolve their feud. However, the essence of the dispute between Zhu and Zhu did not lie in making a factual judgment on whether to resolve the feud or not. It was a confrontation between two very different political ideas about party contention. Zhou Bi-da believed in the idea of harmony in politics and insisted that the court should use people regardless of party affiliation. Zhu Xi argued that the most important task of politics was to distinguish between the "gentleman" and the "villain", and resolutely opposed the harmony between the two. Throughout the Southern Song Dynasty, there were many followers of both ideas, but generally speaking, The harmony thought represented by Zhou Bida gained more favor and became an important feature of the politics of the Southern Song Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 中山大学历史系;
【分类号】：K245

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 夏汉宁;朱熹、周必大关于欧阳修《范公神道碑》的论争[J];江西社会科学;2004年03期

2 谷敏;;周必大对小说与正史的态度——也谈“范仲淹神道碑”的删文问题[J];文献;2007年03期

3 李光生;;周必大与杨万里政治关系考辨[J];上饶师范学院学报;2010年05期

4 邹锦良;;杨万里与周必大交谊考论[J];井冈山大学学报(社会科学版);2011年06期

5 李精一;;略论南宋周必大的四六文[J];学术交流;2012年05期

6 杨瑞;;周必大与杨万里交游考述[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期

7 邹锦良;;周必大国防建设思想探析[J];军事历史;2014年01期

8 王聪聪;;周必大与范成大交游考述[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年01期

9 吴洪o，

本文编号：1510954