宋金海上联盟时期东亚政治格局演变研究

发布时间：2018-02-25 02:12

本文关键词： 海上之盟 12世纪上半叶东亚政治格局　出处：《上海师范大学》2016年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：海上之盟是12世纪上半叶的一个重大历史事件,影响了东亚政治格局的演变。但目前关于海上之盟的研究,还主要集中于海上之盟的经过、内容、评价等方面,对海上之盟与当时东亚政治格局的关系,鲜有专门的讨论。本文以“大宋史”和“东亚世界”为视野,对海上之盟订立前夕、海上之盟订立期间,以及海上之盟订立后东亚政治格局的变化进行了讨论。在海上之盟订立前夕,因宋、金的挑战,以辽为中心的东亚政治格局正发生巨大变化。而海上之盟则是宋、金挑战辽在东亚政治军事地位受挫后的产物。宋金接触与海上之盟的订立,增强了彼此反辽的实力,改变了对辽的政治、军事实力对比,也对西夏和高丽造成了一定影响。而1122年金宋同盟的正式攻辽,更是导致了东亚政治格局的进一步变化。首先,是燕山地区割据势力的出现与灭亡。其次,是契丹立国重心发生转移。第三,是金与西夏、高丽两国宗藩关系的渐次确立。第四,是南北对峙新形势的确立,即金对宋政治军事主导地位的逐渐确立。最终,金结束了辽在东亚的统治,打败了宋,又迫使西夏和高丽臣服,建立了以金为中心的东亚政治新格局。海上之盟订立后,金对政治新格局的建立,表现在政治版图与政权关系两个方面上。围绕着不同的政治势力,金的侧重点也有所不同。对辽,金的侧重点在政治版图上。对西夏和高丽,金的侧重点在政权关系上。对宋,则随着两国关系的变化而变化。在金宋同盟时期,金的侧重点在于建立对等的政权关系,对宋的领土无要求。在金宋同盟破裂后,金一方面重视建立与宋的不平等关系,另一方面又重视对宋领土的占有。相较于以辽为中心的东亚政治旧格局,在以金为中心的东亚政治新格局中,无论是对中原的宋政权,还是对较弱小的西夏与高丽,金都取得了比辽更高的国际政治地位。海上之盟与12世纪上半叶东亚政治格局的演变有着密切关联。海上之盟受12世纪上半叶东亚政治格局演变的影响,反过来又影响了12世纪上半叶东亚政治格局的走向,成为了推动时局鼎革的重要因素之一。
[Abstract]:The alliance of the sea was a major historical event in the first half of 12th century, which affected the evolution of the political pattern in East Asia. But at present, the research on the alliance of the sea is mainly focused on the course, content and evaluation of the alliance of the sea. There is seldom a special discussion on the relationship between the maritime alliance and the political pattern of East Asia at that time. This paper takes "the history of the Great Song Dynasty" and "the World of East Asia" as the visual field of view, during the period of the formation of the maritime alliance on the eve of the formation of the maritime alliance. On the eve of the formation of the Sea League, the political pattern of East Asia with Liao as the center is undergoing great changes due to the challenge of Song and Jin dynasties, and the Sea League is Song Dynasty. Jin challenged Liao after his political and military status in East Asia was thwarted. The formation of the Song and Jin contacts and the alliance at sea strengthened the strength of each other against Liao and changed the contrast between political and military power to Liao. It also had a certain impact on Xixia and Koryo. And the official attack on Liao by 1122 annuity and Song Union led to further changes in the political structure of East Asia. First, the emergence and extinction of the forces of separation in the Yanshan region. Third, the gradual establishment of the Suzerain-vassal relationship between Jin and Xixia and Koryo. 4th, the establishment of the new situation of North-South confrontation, that is, the gradual establishment of Jin's political and military dominance over the Song Dynasty. Finally, Jin put an end to Liao's rule in East Asia, defeated the Song Dynasty, forced the Western Xia and Koryo to submit, and established a new political pattern in East Asia centered on Jin. It is manifested in two aspects: the relationship between political territory and political power. Around different political forces, the emphasis of Jin is also different. For Liao and Jin, the emphasis is on political territory. For Xixia and Koryo, the focus of Jin is on the relationship of political power. Then it changed with the change of relations between the two countries. During the period of the Jin and Song dynasties, the focus of Jin was on the establishment of reciprocal political power relations, and there was no requirement for the territory of the Song Dynasty. After the breakup of the Jing-Song alliance, Jin attached importance to the establishment of unequal relations with the Song Dynasty on the one hand. On the other hand, it also attached importance to the occupation of the territory of Song Dynasty. Compared with the old pattern of East Asian politics with Liao as the center, in the new pattern of East Asian politics with Jin as the center, it was not only to the Song regime of the Central Plains, but also to the weaker Xixia and Koryo. Jindu gained a higher international political status than Liao. The Sea League was closely related to the evolution of East Asian political pattern in the first half of 12th century. The Sea League was influenced by the evolution of East Asian political pattern in the first half of 12th century. In turn, it influenced the trend of East Asian political pattern in the first half of 12th century, and became one of the important factors to push forward the great revolution.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：K244;K246.4

【参考文献】