《春秋》三传立主制度发微

发布时间：2018-02-25 17:10

本文关键词： 《春秋》三传桑主栗主春秋礼制　出处：《中国史研究》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：关于春秋时期丧祭设立庙主的制度,《春秋》三传各有所论,汉唐以来诸儒多以三传所言为一种统一的制度。但实际上《春秋》三传关于先秦立主制度的论述,各有其义,并不能混为一事。郑玄、孔颖达合三传所论为一,不能代表汉代《春秋》今文学家的本意,亦与春秋礼制的实际不尽相合。而《公羊传》《z@梁传》的立主之说则很可能是战国礼学家构建的整齐之制,一定程度上掺杂了后儒理想化、规范化的认知,其所论述的制度并不一定为先秦礼制的实际。
[Abstract]:Concerning the system of setting up temple masters for funeral sacrifices in the Spring and Autumn period, the three legends of the Spring and Autumn period have their own views. Since the Han and Tang dynasties, many scholars have made the three legacies a unified system. But in fact, the three legacies of the three legacies of the Spring and Autumn period have their own meanings in discussing the system of establishing the master in the pre-Qin Dynasty. Zheng Xuan, Kong Yingda and his three legends are one, and they cannot represent the original intention of the scholars of the Han Dynasty in the Spring and Autumn period. It is also not in accord with the actual practice of the ritual system of the Spring and Autumn period. However, the theory of establishing the master of the Rong Sheep and the Legend of Liang is probably a neat system constructed by the courtesies of the warring States period. To a certain extent, it has mixed up the idealized and standardized cognition of the post-Confucianism. The system it discusses is not necessarily the reality of the pre-Qin ritual system.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学人文学院;
【分类号】：K225.04

【相似文献】