明抗倭援朝战争初期中朝宗藩间之“信任危机”及其根源

发布时间：2018-04-28 04:23

本文选题：明代中朝关系 + 抗倭援朝战争　；参考：《古代文明》2017年01期

【摘要】：抗倭援朝战争初期,明与朝鲜间本来稳固的宗藩互信关系出现危机。战前,先是朝鲜私自通信日本种下祸根,继由东亚贸易网传来朝鲜诱引日本入犯大明的报告。朝鲜感到压力后迅速派使辩诬,暂时修复了信任关系。战初,朝鲜节节溃败,但迟迟未向明廷请援,再度引起明朝怀疑。面对危局,明朝主动派人勘疑,先后派三拨使节进入朝鲜;朝鲜则连遣使节入辽、入京请援,同时与东来明使臣沟通,释疑辩诬。经过努力,双方终于再建信任关系,并迅速投入到联合对日作战中。上述信任危机的产生及其应对处置,一方面揭示出明代中朝"典型宗藩关系"中存在"不典型"的一面,"事大字小"行为中隐含着别有意味的内涵;另一方面也反映了明、鲜宗藩关系框架下,辩诬、勘疑等手段因常用于处理不良事件而成为宗藩体制之重要内容。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the war, there was a crisis in the suzerain-vassal trust relationship between Ming and North Korea. Before the war, North Korea privately wrote to Japan to sow the scourge, followed by reports from the East Asian Trade Network that North Korea induced Japan to commit the invasion of Daming. North Korea felt the pressure quickly sent the argument falsely, temporarily repaired the relationship of trust. At the beginning of the war, North Korea was defeated, but delayed to seek assistance from the Ming Dynasty, again aroused suspicion in the Ming Dynasty. In the face of crisis, the Ming Dynasty took the initiative to send people to investigate and suspect, sending three envoys to North Korea successively; North Korea sent envoys to Liao Dynasty, to Beijing to ask for assistance, and at the same time to communicate with the envoys of the Ming Dynasty to explain the suspicion and defend the case. After hard work, the two sides finally re-established trust, and quickly into the joint war against Japan. The emergence of the trust crisis mentioned above and how to deal with it reveal, on the one hand, the "atypical" side of the "typical suzerain-vassal relationship" between China and China in the Ming Dynasty, in which there is an implication in the behavior of "big characters and small characters"; on the other hand, it also reflects the Ming Dynasty. Under the framework of Suzerain-vassal relationship, the defense of falsehood and suspicion has become an important content of the suzerain-vassal system because it is often used to deal with adverse events.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K248.205

【相似文献】