李长之“司马迁生于公元前135年说”驳论

发布时间：2018-05-05 18:12

  本文选题：李长之 + 下行文　； 参考：《史学月刊》2017年10期

【摘要】：正关于司马迁的生年,主要有公元前145年与公元前135年两种说法。公元前135年说(亦称建元六年说)者,学术界一般以郭沫若为代表,其实祖述者为李长之。李氏举证十条以立其说,文章题称《司马迁生年为建元六年辨》(以下行文简称"李文"),最早发表于1944年5月出刊的《中国文学》一卷二期,后收入1948年开明书店出版的李氏专著《司马迁之人格与风格》一书。李文发表未引起学术界的重视,到了1955年,郭沫若在《历史研究》第6期发表《"太史公行
[Abstract]:Si Maqian is about the year of birth, mainly 145 BC and 135 BC two kinds of statements. In 135 B.C. (also known as Jian Yuan six years said), the academic community generally represented by Guo Moruo, in fact, the ancestors of Li Changzhi. The article entitled "Sima Qiansheng year is the six years of founding Yuan" (hereinafter referred to as "Li Wen") was first published in May 1944 and published in the second volume of "Chinese Literature". In 1948, Li's monograph Si Maqian's Personality and style was published by the Knowledgebookshop. Li Wen's publication did not attract the attention of the academic community. By 1955, Guo Moruo published < "Taishi Gong Xing" in the 6th issue of Historical Studies.
【作者单位】： 国防大学军事文化学院;
【分类号】：K234.1
，

本文编号：1848766